‘. . . It is also inconceivable that the court would receive inadmissible evidence; for the court must act according to law.’
Judges:
Scarman LJ
Citations:
[1975] 62 Cr App R 53
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Pinfold, Mackenney v Regina CACD 15-Dec-2003
The appellants challenged their convictions for murder. The convictions had been based substantially upon the evidence of a co-accused who had admitted his part. They now challenged the admission by way of support of the evidence of the co-defendant . .
Cited – Levey, Regina v CACD 27-Jul-2006
The defendant appealed against his conviction of manslaughter of his baby son. He said that a family court had previously investigated the same allegations and had explicitly found itself unable to say which of himself and the mother were . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Evidence
Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.190485
