After a tribunal application, the applicant submitted his costs for taxation. After the hearing there was further correspondence about the decision, resulting in the applicant formally objecting to the taxation. He suggested that the correspondence after the award meant that taxation had not been concluded. It was held that he was out of time. The taxation award had all the elements necessary to make it final, and the President’s refusal of extension of time was not irrational or unreasonable. The reasons were succinct, but correct.
Judges:
Langley J
Citations:
Gazette 31-Aug-2000, [2000] EWHC Admin 384
Links:
Statutes:
Lands Tribunal Rules 1996 (1996 No 1022) 52
Costs, Administrative, Land
Updated: 19 May 2022; Ref: scu.87117