Regina v Klineberg; Regina v Marsden: CACD 19 Nov 1998

When money had been received on a trust to send to a stakeholder but was misappropriated, the money still belonged to the payer, and a prosecution for theft was correct. This was different from cases where money was spent for the purposes stated.
Times 19-Nov-1998
Theft Act 1968 5(3)
England and Wales
Citing:
CitedRegina v Preddy; Regina v Slade; Regina v Dhillon (Conjoined Appeals) HL 10-Jul-1996
The appellants were said to have made false mortgage applications. They appealed convictions for dishonestly obtaining property by deception.
Held: A chose in action created by an electronic bank transfer was not property which was capable of . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 April 2021; Ref: scu.87092