Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal ex parte Patel: HL 1988

The respondent, a stateless person with an identity certificate rather than a passport, had obtained entry clearance to the UK by falsely representing that he was a single man.
Held: Where fraud has been exercised to obtain leave to enter that is a sufficient ground for exclusion of the fraudster from the United Kingdom on the grounds that such exclusion is conducive to the public good Conduct such as entering a marriage of convenience or using other forms of deception can constitute conduct that can result in a lawful decision to deport irrespective of whether there has been a criminal conviction.

Judges:

Lord Bridge of Harwich, Lord Elwyn-Jones, Lord Ackner, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle

Citations:

[1988] AC 910, [1988] UKHL 14, [1988] 2 WLR 1165, [1988] Imm AR 434, [1988] 2 All ER

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Immigration Act 1971 33(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRegina (James Yankey) v Secretary of State for Home Department Admn 7-Aug-2001
The applicant appealed refusal of leave to enter the UK. He had used a false passport. Where fraud has been exercised to obtain leave to enter, that is a sufficient ground for exclusion of the fraudster from the United Kingdom, on the grounds that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Immigration

Updated: 19 July 2022; Ref: scu.183459