Regina v Hall: CACD 31 Jul 2002

The defendant appealed saying that because his counsel had been diagnosed seriously ill immediately after his trial, he had not had competent representation.
Held: The actual decisions made by counsel during the trial were within the range of decisions a competent counsel would make. It was for the professional bodies concerned and the common sense of the lawyer to make appropriate decisions. There was no reason here to allow the appeal.

Judges:

Lord Justice Rose, Mr Justice Colman and Mr Justice Roderick Evans

Citations:

Times 27-Aug-2002, [2002] EWCA Crim 1881

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Criminal Practice, Legal Professions

Updated: 06 June 2022; Ref: scu.174749