Regina v Giles: CACD 13 Mar 1997

The case involved an assault. The crown sought to introduce as evidence a statement made by the defendant’s brother at the scene under the res gestae rule.
Held: The circumstances were such as to allow admission of the evidence under the tests laid down in Andrews and Ratten.

Citations:

[1997] EWCA Crim 731

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedRatten v The Queen PC 1-Jul-1971
Res Gestae to admit circumstances of complaint
(Victoria) Evidence had been admitted under the res gestae rule, that a woman making a telephone call was in a hysterical state.
Held: It was properly used. Where a statement is made either by the victim of an attack or by a bystander, which . .
CitedRegina v Andrews HL 1987
Res Gestae no means of avoiding witness
The court should deprecate any attempt to use the res gestae doctrine as a device to avoid calling a witness if he or she were available. The court laid down six tests for the admission of evidence under the res gestae rule.
Lord Ackner said: . .

Cited by:

CitedRegina v W (Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1972) CACD 8-May-2003
The allegation was of a serious assault on the defendant’s wife. The prosecution considered she would not be a reliable witness, and did not call her. Other evidence being inadmissible, the defendant was acquitted. The AG appealed.
Held: There . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 06 July 2022; Ref: scu.150186