References:  Crim LR 197
Ratio: The defendant appealed saying that the judge had wrongly accepted an amendment of the jury’s verdict.
Held: The appeal was dismissed. The verdict of not guilty had been corrected almost instantaneously and the judge had rightly exercised his discretion in accepting the amendment.
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Regina v Tantram; Regina v Bibby etc CACD (Times 20-Jul-01,  EWCA Crim 1364, Bailii)
The defendants appealed against their convictions for conspiracy in have combined to put into the human food chain poultry meat which had been condemned as unfit. The jury after retiremen had indicated that they had reached agreement on some . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 19 March 2019