Regina v Flowers, Graver and Cunningham, Smith and Bradley; Attorney General’s references No 114 of 2002, 115 of 2002 116 of 2002, 144 of 2002, 145 of 202: CACD 26 Nov 2003

Mr Justice Leveson Lord Justice Rose Mr Justice Tugendhat
[2003] EWCA Crim 3374
England and Wales
CitedSekhon, etc v Regina CACD 16-Dec-2002
The defendants appealed against confiscation orders on the basis that in various ways, the Crown had failed to comply with procedural requirements.
Held: The courts must remember the importance of such procedures in the fight against crime, . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 02 March 2021; Ref: scu.188252