Regina v East Sussex County Council (ex parte Reprotech (Pebsham) Limited): Admn 30 Jul 1999

Where an application for an alteration in a planning permission would mean also that the original use for which permission had been granted would need alteration, a local authority was correct to treat the new use as if it had been a use ancillary to the original.

Citations:

Times 14-Sep-1999, [1999] EWHC Admin 769

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Town and Country Planning Act 1990 64

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromRegina (Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd) v East Sussex County Council Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd v Same HL 28-Feb-2002
The respondent company had asserted that the local authority had made a determination of the issue of whether electricity could be generated on a waste treatment site without further planning permission. The council said that without a formal . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Planning

Updated: 28 May 2022; Ref: scu.140033