Regina v Claydon; Regina v Regina v Hall; Regina v Costall; Regina v French: CACD 13 Jun 2001

The defendants faced substantial trials involving drugs offences. At a preparatory hearing the court made decisions about abuse of process and as to what evidence might be admitted. The prosecutor said there was no right of appeal.
Held: (publication having been held back) Since the issues would have been heard in the absence of the jury during a trial, it was possible for them to be heard at a preparatory hearing, and also therefore an interlocutory right of appeal lay. Parliament had clearly intended such rulings to be capable of bing subject of an interlocutory appeal.

Judges:

Henry LJ, Jack J, Sir Harry Ognall

Citations:

Times 13-Feb-2004, [2004] 1 WLR 1575, [2001] EWCA Crim 1359

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 829 35, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 78

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Not followedIn re Gunawardena, Harbutt and Banks CACD 1990
The defendant applied to stay the proceedings on the grounds that they were an abuse of process.
Held: The application for leave to appeal was rejected. The application to stay was not within the ambit of the preparatory hearing and therefore . .
CitedRegina v Moore CACD 5-Feb-1991
The court considered whether to quash a count of theft: ‘The fact that a possible incidental effect of the purposes of the application does find itself within those sub-provisions (a) to (d) is not one of the purposes of those provisions. It is the . .
CitedRegina v Moore CACD 5-Feb-1991
The court considered whether to quash a count of theft: ‘The fact that a possible incidental effect of the purposes of the application does find itself within those sub-provisions (a) to (d) is not one of the purposes of those provisions. It is the . .
CitedRegina v Jennings, Regina v Johnson, Regina v Mullins CACD 6-Sep-1993
No appeal lies against a Crown Court decision not to sever an indictment at a preparatory hearing. As an interlocutory order no appeal lay. . .
CitedRegina v Moore and others CACD 9-Feb-1995
. .
CitedRegina v Moore and others CACD 9-Feb-1995
. .
CitedRegina v Hedworth CACD 20-Sep-1996
The court allowed amendment of the indictment to reflect the law as demonstrated in Preddy, and at a preparatory hearing application was made to quash the amended indictment on the basis that the charges were not supported by evidence in the . .
CitedRegina v R CACD 2-Feb-2001
The defendant was tried on several sexual offences, amongst which was included a rape of a girl under 16, committed abroad before the Act came into effect. He appealed.
Held: The convictions were set aside. The rape was non-justiciable, since . .

Cited by:

CitedH, Regina v (Interlocutory application: Disclosure) HL 28-Feb-2007
The trial judge had refused an order requested at a preparatory hearing by the defence for the disclosure of documents held by the prosecutor. The House was now asked whether a right of appeal existed against such a refusal.
Held: The practice . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.193470