Regina v Chaouk: 14 Apr 1986

(Supreme Court of Victoria) The court considered an appeal beed upon allegations as to the jury directions given after retirement.

Citations:

[1986] VicRp 70, [1986] VR 707, Austlii

Jurisdiction:

Australia

Citing:

CitedRegina v Prime CACD 1973
Widgery LCJ said: ‘It is important in all criminal cases that the judge should on the first occasion when the jury separate warn them not to talk about the case to anybody who is not one of their number.’ . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.575315