Regina v Chandler: CACD 2002

The Court of Appeal will not interfere with the trial judge’s assessment of the facts unless there has been shown to have been a serious error.


[2002] EWCA Crim 3167


England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Moore and Another CACD 13-Feb-2013
The appellants said that they had been entrapped into committing the offences of which they stood convicted. Their applications for stay on the ground of abuse of process had been rejected.
Held: The appeal failed.
Rix Lj said: ‘the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 30 May 2022; Ref: scu.471002