Regina (on the Application of Elizabeth Heather; Martin Ward; Hilary Callin) v The Leonard Cheshire Foundation and H M Attorney General: Admn 15 Jun 2001

The applicants sought review of the decision of the respondent to close the residential home in which they lived.
Held: The Foundation, though a charity, was not a public body, and its decisions were not properly subject to an application for judicial review.

Citations:

[2001] EWHC Admin 429

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

Appealed To – Regina (Heather and Another) v Leonard Cheshire Foundation CA 21-Mar-2002
The appellants appealed rejection of their application for judicial review. They were long term residents in a nursing home, which the respondents had decided to close.
Held: Though the respondent did exercise some public functions, and its . .

Cited by:

Appeal from – Regina (Heather and Another) v Leonard Cheshire Foundation CA 21-Mar-2002
The appellants appealed rejection of their application for judicial review. They were long term residents in a nursing home, which the respondents had decided to close.
Held: Though the respondent did exercise some public functions, and its . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Judicial Review, Charity

Updated: 29 May 2022; Ref: scu.140337