Regina (on the Application of Bruno Quintavalle on Behalf of Pro-Life Alliance) v Secretary of State for Health: Admn 15 Nov 2001

Where procedures produced a clone of a human cell or embryo, that was not an embryo within and subject to regulation under the Act, since there had been no process of fertilisation, which is a pre-requisite under the Act. A cloned cell could not be a ’embryo where fertilisation is complete.’

Judges:

Mr Justice Crane

Citations:

Times 05-Dec-2001, [2001] EWHC Admin 918, [2001] 4 All ER 1013

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 1(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromRegina (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health CA 18-Jan-2002
A cloned cell, a cell produced by cell nuclear replacement came within the definition of embryo under the Act. The Act required that fertilisation was complete.
Held: The act could be applied in a purposive way. The legislative policy was that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights, Health

Updated: 05 June 2022; Ref: scu.167264