Regina (Ash and Lacy Building Products Ltd) v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks: ChD 1 Feb 2002

Revocation proceedings were brought before the Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. The revocation proceedings were withdrawn, but the Comptroller decided to continue his examination. The patent owner sought to challenge this decision.
Held: There is a difference between proceedings before the Comptroller conducted under the Manual of the Patent Office, and proceedings at court under the CPR. Under the latter, the court had no jurisdiction to continue after proceedings had been withdrawn, but that restriction did not apply to the Comptroller.

Judges:

Laddie J

Citations:

Times 12-Mar-2002, Gazette 15-Mar-2002

Statutes:

Patents Act 1977 77, Civil Procedure Rules 38

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Intellectual Property, Civil Procedure Rules

Updated: 12 April 2022; Ref: scu.167748