Orders had been made for the protection of the identity of two men who committed a notorious murder as a child. Members of the child’s family now sought variation of the order as regards this respondent. It was said that the order had been intended to protect him as a child in the hope that he would be allowed rehabilitation. They now said that this had failed,
Held: Orders were now made for further evidence and draft orders to be filed.
Judges:
Sir James Munby P FD
Citations:
[2018] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Family
Updated: 24 April 2022; Ref: scu.618409