BCLC 376
Cited – Re Haden Bill Electrical Ltd 1995
The petitioner had had in practice control of the company as chairman and though he owned only 25% of the shares. His own company loaned andpound;200,000 to the company as working capital. He complained that he had been removed as a director.
 2 BCLC 280
Mentioned – In the Matter of Pectel Limited; Mark Anthony O’Neill; Linda Ann O’Neill v Michael Phillips; LiSA Phillips and Pectel Limited CA 1-May-1997
The petitioners sought either the purchase of their shares, or the winding up of the company alleging unfair prejudice in the management of the company. The defendants argued that what was complained of did not fall within section 459 since it was . .
 EWCA Civ 1591
These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 15 December 2020; Ref: scu.264073