Skip to content

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

Law
- More Recent Cases
- e-Legal Gathering
- Case Layout
- FAQ
- Searching
- Areas of Law
- law index
- Courts
- Reports
- Judges
- Case Names
Privacy
About
Advertising
Registration

Random House Inc v Strong: Nom 7 Mar 2006

Citations:

[2006] DRS 3270

Links:

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Intellectual Property

Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.239775

Posted on July 5, 2022 by dlsPosted in Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: The State v Khoyratty: PC 22 Mar 2006

Next Next post: Kyle Bay Ltd (T/A Astons Nightclub) v Underwriters Subscribing Under Policy No. 019057/08/01: ComC 29 Mar 2006

Search for:

Areas of Law:

Recent Posts

Nayif v The High Commission of Brunei Darussalam: CA 27 Nov 2014
Mackay and Scottish Borders Council: SIC 22 Jan 2015
AJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA): UTAA 8 May 2014
C v K: FD 4 Dec 2014
A v D and Others: FD 9 Dec 2014
West Berkshire District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 17 May 2012
Office of Communications (Decision Notice): ICO 21 Mar 2012
S v S (Brussels II Revised: Articles 19(1) and (3): Reference To CJEU): FD 21 Oct 2014
24 Mayfields – Bath and North East Somerset : Midland : Birmingham: LVT 8 May 2014
West Berkshire District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 25 Feb 2013
First Plus Financial Group Plc v Pithers: CA 16 Jan 2013
London and Quadrant Housing Trust v Prestige Properties Ltd: CA 14 Jan 2013
Astrazeneca Ab v Hexal Ag and Others: CA 30 Apr 2013
The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Highland Financial Partners Lp and Others: CA 30 Apr 2013
Tayeh v Barchester Healthcare Ltd: CA 6 Feb 2013
Devon County Council v TR: CA 30 Apr 2013
Societe Des Produits Nestle SA v Cadbury UK Ltd: CA 4 Oct 2013
Re C (A Child): CA 25 Apr 2013
Auladin v Shaikh and Others: QBD 5 Feb 2013
Thebo, Regina (on The Application of) v Entry Clearance Officer Islamabad (Pakistan): Admn 5 Feb 2013
Hanlon v Rotary Services Limited (In Adminstration): NIIT 27 Nov 2012
Blackmore v Norris (T/A NB Autoparts): NIIT 20 Sep 2012
Maimann v Reyhanian: CA 19 Jan 2006
SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for The Home Department: CA 13 Jul 2012
Regina v Taylor: CACD 14 Jul 2011
Actavis Group Hf v Eli Lilly and Company: PatC 27 Nov 2012
Sullivan v The Government of The United States of America and Another: Admn 20 Jun 2012
AA v The United Kingdom: ECHR 20 Sep 2011
M, Regina (on The Application of) v The Parole Board and Secretary of State for Justice: Admn 5 Feb 2013
Magee v The United Kingdom: ECHR 7 Nov 2012
Smith v ADVFN Plc and Others: CA 13 Jul 2011
V-Coil (Trade Mark: Invalidity): IPO 14 Jun 2006
Jethwa and Others v The Government of The United States of America: Admn 17 Jan 2012
Vogue (Trade Mark: Inter Partes): IPO 18 Oct 2006
Agilent Technologies Inc (Patent): IPO 31 May 2006
Snuggles (Trade Mark: Revocation): IPO 14 Jun 2006
Vitalite (Trade Mark: Invalidity): IPO 14 Jun 2006
Brampton Manor (Trade Mark: Opposition): IPO 14 Jun 2006
Mustafa Munir Atagun v Turkey: ECHR 15 Nov 2011
Tappin v The Government of the United States of America: Admn 13 Jan 2012
Norris v Time Worldwide Express Limited: NIIT 23 Sep 2011
In re N-C ( Children): CA 10 Aug 2011
Re G (A Child): CA 19 Apr 2011
Bt Plc and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills and Others: CA 7 Oct 2011
Saxon Weald Homes Ltd v Chadwick: CA 26 Oct 2011
261 Portobello Road – Kensington and Chelsea : London (Flats – Enfranchisement and New Leases): LVT 20 Sep 2011
Flat 19, The Renovation 4 Woolwich Manor Way – Newham : London: LVT 14 Jul 2011
5 Princes Tower 97 Rotherhithe Street – Southwark : London: LVT 14 Jul 2011
121 George Street – Westminster : London: LVT 14 Jul 2011
Field Fisher Waterhouse Llp v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 14 Jul 2011

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

Search for:

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.