Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 5-3 with regard to length of detention; No violation of Art. 5-3 with regard to refusal of bail; No violation of Art. 6-1; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award; Costs and expenses partial award
Citations:
31315/96, [2000] ECHR 170
Links:
Jurisdiction:
Human Rights
Cited by:
Cited – O v Crown Court at Harrow HL 26-Jul-2006
The claimant said that his continued detention after the custody time limits had expired was an infringement of his human rights. He faced continued detention having been refused bail because of his arrest on a grave charge, having a previous . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights
Updated: 04 June 2022; Ref: scu.165866
