Citations:
[2005] ICR 222
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Powerhouse Retail Ltd and others v Burroughs and others CA 7-Oct-2004
The court considered the non-admission of part time workers to pension scheme benefits after a transfer of employment.
Held: (Pill LJ) While the effect of TUPE was that the continuing contract of employment was deemed always to have been with . .
At EAT – Powerhouse Retail Ltd and others v Burroughs and others; Preston and others v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust and others (No 3) HL 8-Mar-2006
The appellants said they had been had been discriminated against on the grounds of their sex by the TUPE Regulations. Their discrimination cases had been dismissed as out of time.
Held: The employees’ appeals were dismissed: ‘A statute cannot . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, Employment
Updated: 14 May 2022; Ref: scu.239030
