Citations:
[2002] EWCA Civ 1448
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Popely v Popely CA 30-Apr-2004
The expression ‘cross-demand’ in rule 6.5(4)(a) did not imply any kind of procedural or juridical relationship to the debt subject to the statutory demand. All it meant was that the demand was one that went the other way, i.e. was a demand by the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Insolvency
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.217733
