Popely v Popely: CA 3 Oct 2002

Citations:

[2002] EWCA Civ 1448

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See AlsoPopely v Popely CA 30-Apr-2004
The expression ‘cross-demand’ in rule 6.5(4)(a) did not imply any kind of procedural or juridical relationship to the debt subject to the statutory demand. All it meant was that the demand was one that went the other way, i.e. was a demand by the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Insolvency

Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.217733