Poosathurai v Kannappa Chettiar: PC 1919


[1919] LR 47 1A



Cited by:

CitedCIBC Mortgages Plc v Pitt and Another HL 21-Oct-1993
Mrs Pitt resisted an order for possession of the house saying that she had signed the mortgage only after misrepresentations by and the undue infuence of her husband who was acting as the bank’s agent.
Held: A bank was not put on enquiry as to . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Undue Influence

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.221026