Piglowska v Piglowski: CA 3 Nov 1997

The husband appealed against an order made on an ancillary relief application saying that the judge had refused to admit further evidence.
Simon Brown, Ward LJJ
[1997] EWCA Civ 2622
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal fromPiglowska v Piglowski HL 24-Jun-1999
When looking to the needs of parties in a divorce, there is no presumption that both parties are to be left able to purchase alternative homes. The order of sub-clauses in the Act implies nothing as to their relative importance. Courts should be . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 24 April 2021; Ref: scu.143021