(Grand Chamber) The applicant alleged, in particular, that his criminal conviction and sentence in Switzerland on account of public statements that he had made there in 2005 had been in breach of his right to freedom of expression and of his right not to be punished without law.
Dean Spielmann, President
27510/08 (Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) : Court (Grand Chamber)), [2015] ECHR 907
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights
Citing:
See Also – Perincek v Switzerland ECHR 17-Dec-2013
ECHR Article 10-1
Freedom of expression
Criminal conviction for rejecting legal characterisation of atrocities committed by Ottoman Empire against the Armenian people from 1915 as ‘genocide’: . .
See Also – Perincek v Switzerland ECHR 17-Dec-2013
. .
Cited by:
Cited – Miller v The College of Policing CA 20-Dec-2021
Hate-Incident Guidance Inflexible and Unlawful
The central issue raised in the appeal is the lawfulness of certain parts of a document entitled the Hate Crime Operational Guidance (the Guidance). The Guidance, issued in 2014 by the College of Policing (the College), the respondent to this . .
Cited – Miller v The College of Policing CA 20-Dec-2021
Hate-Incident Guidance Inflexible and Unlawful
The central issue raised in the appeal is the lawfulness of certain parts of a document entitled the Hate Crime Operational Guidance (the Guidance). The Guidance, issued in 2014 by the College of Policing (the College), the respondent to this . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights
Updated: 30 December 2021; Ref: scu.553525
