Parks v Clout: CA 22 Oct 2002

Application for leave to make second appeal. Brother of deceased alleging that the widower had obtained probate by falsely representing that no will had been made by the deceased.
Held: Insofar as the judge had based his conclusion on an incorrect assertion that circumstantial evidence could not be used at all to base a conclusion as to whether a will had been executed, the appeal had to be allowed to go ahead.

Judges:

Jonathan-Parker LJ

Citations:

[2002] EWCA Civ 1565

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedAtkinson v Morris CA 1897
The plaintiff was able to prove that the testator had said she had destroyed one copy of a will she had made in duplicate.
Held: Though that evidence would have had the effect of revocation, it was hearsay and inadmissible and her intentions . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Wills and Probate, Evidence

Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.217724