Paragon v Thakerer: 1993

A claim for fraudulent or intentional breach of trust/fiduciary duty is a different cause of action from a claim for breach of trust/fiduciary duty generally and must be separately and distinctly pleaded.
References: [1993] 1 All ER 400
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case is cited by:

  • Cited – Berezovsky v Abramovich ComC 22-May-2008
    Applications were made to amend pleadings and for consequential orders. The claimant sought damages of $4.3 billion alleging breach of trust. The claimant sought to add claims which the defendant said were out of time.
    Held: The proposed . .
    (, [2008] EWHC 1138 (Comm))

These lists may be incomplete.
Last Update: 27 November 2020; Ref: scu.268053