A ute was in the Spiritual Court, and sentence pass’d for one with costs, and 9 months after the costs are assest, and tax’d. And then comes a pardon of 21 Jac. which relates before the taxing of costs. But afterwards the sentence and that pardon was pleaded, and allowed in discharge of the costs. Then W. who had recovered sues an appeal, and P. brought a prohibitioii, and well, and no consultation shall be awarded, because by the Court that pardon relating before the taxation of costs had discharged them. As 5 Rep. 51. Hall’s case.
Citations:
[1669] EngR 366, (1669) Noy 91, (1669) 74 ER 1057 (C)
Links:
Ecclesiastical, Costs
Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.407206
