EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: New evidence on appeal
SEX DISCRIMINATION: Direct
RACE DISCRIMINATION: Direct
Applications by the Claimant for admission of new evidence were refused: Ladd v Marshall applied. The Employment Tribunal examined the 40-odd claims and dismissed all but one contract claim. No error of law. The Claimant contended that the Employment Judge displayed an error of law in oral exchanges with her leading counsel but these were not reflected in her counsel’s evidence to the EAT nor in the reserved judgment of the full Tribunal, which is the proper source of the its self-directions.
Judges:
McMullen QC J
Citations:
[2009] UKEAT 0167 – 09 – 2907
Links:
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 11 August 2022; Ref: scu.392520