Click the case name for better results:

Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: Admn 16 Oct 2013

Application under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning 1990 (1990 Act) to quash a decision letter on the part of an inspector appointed by the First Defendant to hear an appeal lodged by the applicant under section 195 of the 1990 Act against refusal on the part of the Second Defendant to grant … Continue reading Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government: Admn 16 Oct 2013

Sustainable Shetland, Re Judicial Review: SCS 24 Sep 2013

Outer House – The petitioner environmental group objected to the grant under the 1989 Act of permission for the construction for a substantial wind farm in Central Mainland, Shetland. Lady Clark of Calton [2013] ScotCS CSOH – 158 Bailii Electricity Act 1989, Electricity Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2000, Town and Country Planning (Scotland) … Continue reading Sustainable Shetland, Re Judicial Review: SCS 24 Sep 2013

Planning Inspectorate (Central Government): ICO 15 Jul 2015

The complainant has requested information contained in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended). The Commissioner finds that the requested information is reasonably accessible to the public as it is contained in published legislation. The Commissioner has therefore decided that the Planning Inspectorate … Continue reading Planning Inspectorate (Central Government): ICO 15 Jul 2015

Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council and Others: ChD 13 May 2010

The claimant sought a delaration that it had a right of way over an access road. The defendants said that the agreement fell foul of the 1989 Act. Held: The claimant was not entitled to the declaration. Agreements under the 1990 Act are enforceable at the instance of the Authority only and not by third … Continue reading Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council and Others: ChD 13 May 2010

Heald and Others v London Borough of Brent: CA 20 Aug 2009

The court considered whether it was lawful for a local authority to outsource the decision making on homelessness reviews. The appellants said that it could not be contracted out, and that the agent employed lacked the necessary independence and was not democratically accountable. Held: Reviews could be contracted out. The court could ‘not see that … Continue reading Heald and Others v London Borough of Brent: CA 20 Aug 2009

Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council: SC 6 Apr 2011

The land-owner had planning permission to erect a barn, conditional on its use for agricultural purposes. He built inside it a house and lived there from 2002. In 2006. He then applied for a certificate of lawful use. The inspector allowed it, and the Council appealed. The Council now also argued that parliament could not … Continue reading Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council: SC 6 Apr 2011

Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 7 Feb 2011

The claimant sought judicial review of a statement and letter by the respondent making a material consideration for planning authorities the intended revocation by the Respondent of Regional Spatial Strategies. The effect would be to allow the authority to reduce the number of new houses it was planning to allow for and thus to reject … Continue reading Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another: Admn 7 Feb 2011

Save Britain’s Heritage, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others: Admn 14 May 2010

The claimant challenged the order allowing the demolition of a disused listed building saying that the Direction was contrary to European law in not requiring an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The Secretary of State said an EIA was not required for a demolition. Held: The challenge was rejected. Whether an EIA was required for a … Continue reading Save Britain’s Heritage, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others: Admn 14 May 2010

Finn-Kelcey v Milton Keynes Council and MK Windfarm Ltd: CA 10 Oct 2008

Judicial Review must be timely The appellant challenged the grant of permission for a wind farm on neighbouring land. His application for judicial review had been rejected for delay and on the merits. Held: The court repeated the requirement that an application must be both timely and in any event made within three months. Both … Continue reading Finn-Kelcey v Milton Keynes Council and MK Windfarm Ltd: CA 10 Oct 2008

The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council: SC 18 Jul 2012

The Council had granted planning permission for four student housing units. The Executive complained that they were too near to a liquified gas storage depot. The Court was now asked whether the impact of any compensation which might be payable on any revocation of the consent was a proper material consideration for the Council in … Continue reading The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council: SC 18 Jul 2012

Basso and Another v Regina: CACD 19 May 2010

The defendants had been convicted of offences of failing to comply with planning enforcement notices (and fined andpound;10.00), and subsequently made subject to criminal confiscation orders. The orders had been made in respect of the gross income receipts of the business, limited to andpound;760,000. The defendants said that the activities had been otherwise lawful and … Continue reading Basso and Another v Regina: CACD 19 May 2010

Baker and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others: CA 28 Feb 2008

Dyson LJ considered the interaction between race relations law and planning permission in the context of gypsy encampments. He looked at section 71 of the 1976 Act and said: ‘In my judgment, it is important to emphasise that the section 71(1) duty is not a duty to achieve a result, namely to eliminate unlawful racial … Continue reading Baker and Others, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others: CA 28 Feb 2008

Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb and Others: QBD 27 Jun 2011

The Council applied for the committal of the defendant for an alleged breach of a without notice injunction. Notice of the injunction had been placed at the site, requiring nobody to move caravans onto the land. Held: The application succeeded. Having examined the case law the need for committal was established. The defendant was to … Continue reading Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb and Others: QBD 27 Jun 2011

Revenue and Customs v Patel; UTTC 7 Aug 2014

References: [2014] UKUT 361 (TCC) Links: Bailii UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – Repayment claim under DIY Builders’ and Converters’ VAT Refund Scheme – claim refused by HMRC – appeal allowed by First-tier Tribunal – whether VATA s 35 and VAT Regulations 1995 reg 201 satisfied – whether permission pursuant to s 73A Town and Country … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Patel; UTTC 7 Aug 2014

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

London Borough of Haringey (Local Government): ICO 20 Oct 2021

The complainant has requested information , generated by the prosecution of offences under section 179 of The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 , by London Borough of Haringey Council. The Commissioner’s decision is that London Borough of Haringey Council correctly relied on section 12 (costs) not to meet the complainant’s request for information . … Continue reading London Borough of Haringey (Local Government): ICO 20 Oct 2021

Cala Homes (South) Limited v Chichester District Council: Admn 20 Aug 1999

A claim to set aside parts of a local plan had been filed in the wrong court, and without the forms as now required under the Civil Procedure Rules. A new application would be out of time. An application allowing transfer and correction of the faults succeeded, since the true nature of the claim was … Continue reading Cala Homes (South) Limited v Chichester District Council: Admn 20 Aug 1999

Fylde Coast Farms Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Fylde Borough Council: SC 14 May 2021

Single short point about the interpretation and effect of section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (‘the TCPA’), which is headed ‘Legal challenges in relation to neighbourhood development orders’. Judges: Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lady Arden, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens Citations: [2021] UKSC 18 Links: Bailii, Bailii Press Summary, Bli Issues and … Continue reading Fylde Coast Farms Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Fylde Borough Council: SC 14 May 2021

Oyston Estates Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Fylde Borough Council: CA 5 Jul 2019

How should one understand the statutory provisions – in section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 – for proceedings to challenge the steps taken by a local planning authority in making a neighbourhood plan? Judges: Lord Justice Lewison, Lord Justice Lindblom, Lady Justice Rose Citations: [2019] EWCA Civ 1152 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Oyston Estates Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Fylde Borough Council: CA 5 Jul 2019

Dover District Council v CPRE Kent: SC 6 Dec 2017

‘When a local planning authority against the advice of its own professional advisers grants permission for a controversial development, what legal duty, if any, does it have to state the reasons for its decision, and in how much detail? Is such a duty to be found in statutory sources, European or domestic, or in the … Continue reading Dover District Council v CPRE Kent: SC 6 Dec 2017

Regina v Leominster District Council ex parte Pothecary: CA 28 Oct 1997

A building was erected without planning permission. The local planning authority chose not to serve an enforcement notice but rather had invited an application for retrospective planning permission. Held: The fact that a building has already been constructed before planning permission is sought might lawfully be regarded as a consideration in favour of a permission … Continue reading Regina v Leominster District Council ex parte Pothecary: CA 28 Oct 1997

Oxton Farms, Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Selby District Council, Persimmon Homes (Yorkshire) Limited: CA 18 Apr 1997

The complainants challenged a decision to grant planning permission to develop houses on land neighbouring theirs. They owned a substantial proportion of land in the neighbourhood, and they were not bringing enough land forward to allow fulfillment of perceived requirements. Held: Such permission could only be granted, because of its position, in exceptional circumstances. In … Continue reading Oxton Farms, Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Selby District Council, Persimmon Homes (Yorkshire) Limited: CA 18 Apr 1997

Thames Heliport Plc v London Borough of Tower Hamlets: CA 28 Nov 1996

The use of a tethered barge as a heliport constituted a change of use of the land under the river. Citations: Times 10-Dec-1996, [1996] EWCA Civ 1063 Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 55 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – The Carlgarth 1927 Scrutton LJ said: ‘When you invite a person into your … Continue reading Thames Heliport Plc v London Borough of Tower Hamlets: CA 28 Nov 1996

Free Grammar School of John Lyon v City of Westminster Council: UTLC 3 May 2012

UTLC COMPENSATION – tree preservation order – cracks appearing in house – refusal of consent to fell robinia in adjoining garden – claim for costs of underpinning works – the basis for determining causation and foreseeability – whether need for underpinning caused by robinia – whether loss or damage reasonably foreseeable when consent refused – … Continue reading Free Grammar School of John Lyon v City of Westminster Council: UTLC 3 May 2012

Huggett v Secretary of State for the Environment Etc; Wendy Fair Markets Ltd v Same; Bello v Etc: CA 1 Mar 1995

There is no power for Court of Appeal itself to give leave to appeal after High Court’s refusal of leave on an enforcement notice. The court rejected the applicant’s submission that a High Court judge’s decision refusing permission to appeal under section 289 fell within section 16 of the 1981 Act. The Master of the … Continue reading Huggett v Secretary of State for the Environment Etc; Wendy Fair Markets Ltd v Same; Bello v Etc: CA 1 Mar 1995

Regina v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, Ex Parte Milne (2): QBD 31 Jul 2000

Developers submitted applications for outline permission for the development of a business park. The applicant sought to quash the grant on the basis that the environmental assessment was insufficiently detailed, and contained reserved matters, and that the development conflicted with the applicable unitary development plan. Held: The intent of the legislation had been satisfied, and … Continue reading Regina v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council, Ex Parte Milne (2): QBD 31 Jul 2000

Millgate Development Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Wokingham Borough Council: CA 6 Jul 2011

The developer appealed against refusal of an order releasing it from undertakings given to the local authority under section 106. Judges: Pill, Rimer, Munby LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 1062 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 20 September 2022; Ref: scu.444598

Wright, Regina (on The Application of) v Forest of Dean District Council Resilient Energy Serverndale Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2017

Permission for the change of use of land to allow erection of a wind turbine had been quashed on the basis that the LA had taken account of an irrelevant matter, namely the proposed financial contributions from the development to the local community. Held: The appeal failed.Davis LJ gave a short concurring judgment to emphasise … Continue reading Wright, Regina (on The Application of) v Forest of Dean District Council Resilient Energy Serverndale Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2017

Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 17 Mar 2011

The court considered the availability, in private law proceedings between non-contracting parties, of a declaration on the meaning and effect of a planning obligation in a deed made pursuant to provisions in the planning legislation. Judges: Mummery, Moore-Bick, Jackson LJJ Citations: [2011] EWCA Civ 270 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106 … Continue reading Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 17 Mar 2011

Millgate Developments Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v Wokingham Borough Council: Admn 14 Jan 2011

The claimant sought judicial review of the defendants refusal to release it from a unilateral undertaking they had given. Judges: David Pearl J Citations: [2011] EWHC 6 (Admin) Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 31 August 2022; Ref: scu.428075

Lancaster-Thomas v Teignbridge District Council: LT 18 Jun 2007

LT COMPENSATION – planning permission – refusal of planning permission formerly granted by development order – inability to construct a stock proof fence – whether depreciation in the value of the claimant’s freehold interest – nil compensation awarded – Town and Country Planning Act 1990 ssl07 and 108 – Town and Country Planning (General Permitted … Continue reading Lancaster-Thomas v Teignbridge District Council: LT 18 Jun 2007

Aardvark Sre Ltd v Sedgefield Borough Council: LT 5 Feb 2008

LT BLIGHT NOTICE – preliminary issue – house – whether claimant company has a qualifying interest – meaning of owner-occupier – counter-notice of respondent upheld – Town and Country Planning Act 1990 section 168. Judges: A J Trott FRICS Citations: [2008] EWLands BNO – 205 – 2006 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales Land Updated: … Continue reading Aardvark Sre Ltd v Sedgefield Borough Council: LT 5 Feb 2008

Hampshire County Council v Beazer Homes Ltd: QBD 29 Nov 2010

Claim for a declaration as to the meaning of an agreement made under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Judges: Swift J DBE Citations: [2010] EWHC 3095 (QB), [2011] PTSR D8 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 106 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Planning Updated: 18 August 2022; Ref: … Continue reading Hampshire County Council v Beazer Homes Ltd: QBD 29 Nov 2010

Gennard v Bridgnorth District Council: LT 19 Nov 2004

BLIGHT NOTICE – land protected from development by proposals for a relief road – whether blight notice and counter-notice valid and if counter-notice valid, whether that objection to blight notice well founded – determined blight notice and counter-notice valid but counter- notice not well founded – Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 150(1)(b) and … Continue reading Gennard v Bridgnorth District Council: LT 19 Nov 2004

Challinor v Regina: CACD 17 Aug 2007

Judges: Rix, Hughes, Keene LLJ Citations: [2007] EWCA Crim 2102 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 172 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Staffordshire County Council v Challinor TCC 23-Feb-2007 Request for injunction to restrain breach of enforcement notice. . . Cited by: See Also – Staffordshire County Council v … Continue reading Challinor v Regina: CACD 17 Aug 2007

Regina v Westminster City Council, ex parte Monahan: CA 1989

The Royal Opera House sought permission and listed building consents to carry out a re-development, extending and modernising the House raising it to international standards, and to develop the surrounding area consistently with that project. Parts of the site were proposed to be used for the erection of office accommodation, which would be a departure … Continue reading Regina v Westminster City Council, ex parte Monahan: CA 1989

Regina v Basildon District Council: Admn 1996

The essence of the section 187B procedure is to achieve a speedy resolution of a planning problem. The courts have repeatedly emphasised that the injunction proceedings are not to be used as an opportunity to re-argue the planning merits of the case which were matters for the planning authority and the Secretary of State. Judges: … Continue reading Regina v Basildon District Council: Admn 1996

Lisa Smith, Regina (on the Application of) v South Norfolk Council: Admn 10 Nov 2006

The claimant gypsies had bought and moved onto land in Norfolk and stayed there in breach of planning enforcement notices. The inspector upheld the notices, but advised the Council of the difficulties in finding sites and had stayed enforcement for a year. The claimants now said that it was unlawful of the council to use … Continue reading Lisa Smith, Regina (on the Application of) v South Norfolk Council: Admn 10 Nov 2006

Williamson v Mid-Suffolk District Council: LT 18 Jan 2006

LT COMPENSATION – planning permission – discontinuance order – preliminary issue – airfield – scope and effect of planning permissions granted under s73A of Town and Country Planning Act 1990 – whether conditions would continue to bind adjoining land the subject of an earlier, less restrictive planning permission – issue estoppel – abuse of powers … Continue reading Williamson v Mid-Suffolk District Council: LT 18 Jan 2006

Commission v United Kingdom: ECJ 20 Oct 2005

ECJ Failure of a Member State to fufil obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats – Wild fauna and flora.The respondent had failed properly to transpose the Habitats Directive into National Law. The regulations were too general and did not impose sufficiently precise obligations: ‘As the Commission has rightly pointed out, section 54A … Continue reading Commission v United Kingdom: ECJ 20 Oct 2005

Beazer Homes Ltd v Stroude: CA 17 Mar 2005

Mr S asserted a right as against the builders under a section 106 agreement. The builder said that evidence of what had occurred as a background to the agreement should be admitted. The parties had requested the judge to decide as a preliminary issue on the admissibility of that evidence. Held: It was rarely wise … Continue reading Beazer Homes Ltd v Stroude: CA 17 Mar 2005

Regina (Cherwell District Council) v First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 28 Oct 2004

The applicant sought to develop an asylum centre. Rather than apply for planning permission, it had served a notice of proposed development for the Crown. The Council appealed dismissal of its objections to the use of the procedure. Held: The appeal failed. The Crown was not subject to planning control. The section was to be … Continue reading Regina (Cherwell District Council) v First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 28 Oct 2004

Regina v Warwickshire County Council Ex Parte Powergen Plc: QBD 9 Jan 1997

The power to incorporate highway works in planning agreements is limited to subject land. Forbes J said: ‘It is common ground that the new Section 278 was intended to fit into and play its part in the overall legislative system for the controlled development of land through the planning process and I accept that Section … Continue reading Regina v Warwickshire County Council Ex Parte Powergen Plc: QBD 9 Jan 1997

International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council: CA 26 Feb 2004

The council served a stop notice. The company sought compensation. The council replied that the company had no legal or equitable interest in the land affected. Held: The company had occupied the land under a licence. A contractual licensee on land may be, but is not necessarily, an occupier. Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 288, Times … Continue reading International Traders Ferry Ltd v Adur District Council: CA 26 Feb 2004

Regina (on the Application of Kides) v South Cambridgeshire District Council Ltd: CA 9 Oct 2002

The applicant sought a judicial review of a grant of planning permission. She said that in the considerable time gap between the decision in principle, and the decision notice, several elements had changed requiring the decision to be reconsidered. Held: Review was refused. The section required the authority to have regard to all material considerations … Continue reading Regina (on the Application of Kides) v South Cambridgeshire District Council Ltd: CA 9 Oct 2002

Mohammed Aslam v South Bedfordshire District Council: CA 21 Dec 2000

The claimant appealed an award of the Lands Tribunal of compensation for an order discontinuing his use as a slaughterhouse of premises of which he held a long lease. The tribunal had applied a discount for wastage on sheep carcasses of 25%, but had had no evidence to support their conclusion, and the figure proposed … Continue reading Mohammed Aslam v South Bedfordshire District Council: CA 21 Dec 2000

Mid-Sussex District Council v William Charles Boyle: QBD 20 Jul 2001

The authority sought an injunction to restrain a breach of planning control by the defendant. Earlier temporary permissions for single caravans had expired, and enforcement notices issued. The defendant had failed to remove multiple vehicles. Held: The area was designated one of outstanding natural beauty, and that had to be allowed for by the authority. … Continue reading Mid-Sussex District Council v William Charles Boyle: QBD 20 Jul 2001

Regina v Bedfordshire County Council ex parte Henlow Grange Health Farm Ltd: Admn 13 Mar 2001

The applicant owned a health farm. Permission was sought to develop adjoining land, and the applicant objected unsuccessfully, but the Secretary of State then called in the decision. In the meantime, the applicant sought judicial review of the council’s decision, saying that the council had given weight to an irrelevant matter. The application failed. The … Continue reading Regina v Bedfordshire County Council ex parte Henlow Grange Health Farm Ltd: Admn 13 Mar 2001

Regina v East Sussex County Council (ex parte Reprotech (Pebsham) Limited): Admn 30 Jul 1999

Where an application for an alteration in a planning permission would mean also that the original use for which permission had been granted would need alteration, a local authority was correct to treat the new use as if it had been a use ancillary to the original. Citations: Times 14-Sep-1999, [1999] EWHC Admin 769 Links: … Continue reading Regina v East Sussex County Council (ex parte Reprotech (Pebsham) Limited): Admn 30 Jul 1999

Modern Homes (Whitworth) Limited T/a Bower Construction v Lancashire County Council: Admn 27 Apr 1998

After public examination of local structure plan, local authorities post-examination statement must answer all objections including those raised but not dealt with in argument in public at hearing. Citations: Times 14-May-1998, [1998] EWHC Admin 448 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 287 Planning Updated: 27 May 2022; Ref: scu.138569

Harris v The Highways Agency: UTLC 6 Feb 2012

UTLC BLIGHT NOTICE – business premises – alleged blighted land – claimant’s failure to comply with prescribed form – reasonable endeavours to sell – failure to sell – counter notice – appropriate authority’s intention not to acquire any part of land due to proposed cancellation of prospective scheme – claimants’ objections not upheld – blight … Continue reading Harris v The Highways Agency: UTLC 6 Feb 2012

Head v Eastbourne Borough Council: UTLC 22 Dec 2009

UTLC BLIGHT NOTICE – maisonette – blighted land – appropriate authority’s intention not to acquire any part of hereditament – reasonable endeavours to sell – unable to sell unless at substantially reduced price – claimant’s failure to comply with prescribed form – objections not upheld – blight notice valid – Town and Country Planning Act … Continue reading Head v Eastbourne Borough Council: UTLC 22 Dec 2009

Sussex Investments Limited v The Secretary Of State For The Environment, Spelthorne Borough Council: Admn 28 Oct 1996

The plaintiff requested that an enforcement notice should be quashed. Two earlier decision notices had already been quashed. At issue was a houseboat constructed on a floating wooden raft. There was an existing use certificate for a houseboat. Was it a houseboat or floating house? The inspector had taken a definition of houseboat from the … Continue reading Sussex Investments Limited v The Secretary Of State For The Environment, Spelthorne Borough Council: Admn 28 Oct 1996

T A J Moore v The Secretary of State for the Environment, The New Forest District Council: Admn 25 Oct 1996

The applicant sought to quash an enforcement notice, regarding a change of use from residential to mixed residential and holiday accommodation. The change had taken in respect of several units over a long period of time. The inspector sought to bring them together and by treating them as one unit, he brought the development within … Continue reading T A J Moore v The Secretary of State for the Environment, The New Forest District Council: Admn 25 Oct 1996

Bridgnorth District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 12 Jul 2005

Following a complaint from a third party, the Council carried out an investigation into the state of a piece of land owned by the complainant to determine whether any enforcement action was appropriate under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (T and CP Act). The owner of the land requested the right to inspect … Continue reading Bridgnorth District Council (Decision Notice): ICO 12 Jul 2005

North Devon District Council v Secretary of State for Environment, D Rottenbury B E Rottenbury: QBD 12 May 1998

A mandatory agricultural occupancy condition was not subject to a continuous breach when cottages were occupied over summer by visitors rather than by agricultural workers as required by the permission. Citations: Times 12-May-1998, Gazette 28-May-1998, [1998] EWHC Admin 458 Links: Bailii Statutes: Town and Country Planning Act 1990 288 Agriculture, Planning Updated: 19 May 2022; … Continue reading North Devon District Council v Secretary of State for Environment, D Rottenbury B E Rottenbury: QBD 12 May 1998

Bracken v East Hertfordshire District Council: QBD 11 May 2000

An enforcement notice was served on the land owner alleging change of use from agricultural to the storage of building materials and waste and agriculture. The plan incorrectly included the applicant’s house. The applicant challenged the enforcement notice, but failed before the magistrates and on a case stated. The error did not mean that the … Continue reading Bracken v East Hertfordshire District Council: QBD 11 May 2000

Regina (O’Brien) v Basildon District Council: Admn 2006

There is no inherent restriction on the powers in section 178 to prevent a planning authority using them for the purposes of evicting people using land for a residential purpose in breach of an enforcement notice which had taken effect. It would not always be disproportionate to use them for that purpose. The court set … Continue reading Regina (O’Brien) v Basildon District Council: Admn 2006

Van Dyck v Secretary of State for the Environment: CA 1993

The court asked whether the four year enforcement rule applied in respect of subdivision of a larger building to create single dwelling houses or applied only in the case of conversion of a single building to single dwelling houses. Held: It applies to subdivision. The concept of the planning unit has no part to play … Continue reading Van Dyck v Secretary of State for the Environment: CA 1993

Epping Forest District Council v Philcox: CA 13 Apr 2000

Where an activity had been continuing without planning permission for 10 years it was no obstacle to obtaining a certificate of lawful use that the activity had been illegal because it had been carried out without a waste management licence. A certificate once granted is conclusive answer to any enforcement notice subsequently issued and is … Continue reading Epping Forest District Council v Philcox: CA 13 Apr 2000