Click the case name for better results:

Colaingrove Limited v The Commissioners for Customs and Excise: ChD 16 Apr 2003

The Directive exempted from a charge to VAT for letting of imoveable property. The taxpayer challenged the requirement to charge to VAT his business of leasing pitches for caravans. Held: The directive allowed member states to derogate from the exemptions. That is what the UK had done. Judges: The Honourable Mr Justice Jacob Citations: [2003] … Continue reading Colaingrove Limited v The Commissioners for Customs and Excise: ChD 16 Apr 2003

Ashfield District Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 30 Nov 2001

The council were liable to pay grants for building works. They wished to set the VAT element as an input tax. The Commissioners refused. Did the builders supply their services to the house owners, or to the council who paid the bill. The Act allowed the council to pay the sum direct to the builder. … Continue reading Ashfield District Council v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 30 Nov 2001

Franked Investment Income Group Litigation, The Test Claimants In v Revenue and Customs: CA 24 Nov 2016

Judges: Sir Geoffrey Charles Vos Ch, Underhill, David Richards LJJ Citations: [2016] EWCA Civ 1180, [2017] STC 696, [2016] BTC 44, [2017] 1 CMLR 37 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 94 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: At ChD – The Test Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v The Commissioners of Inland … Continue reading Franked Investment Income Group Litigation, The Test Claimants In v Revenue and Customs: CA 24 Nov 2016

Investment Trust Companies v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 2 Mar 2012

The claimant had properly accounted for VAT on its transactions for many years, but a decision of the European court had latterly ruled that the services were exempt. The claimant sought restitution from HMRC, who responded by arguing that substantial parts of the claim were out of time. Held: 1. That, using the notional figures … Continue reading Investment Trust Companies v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 2 Mar 2012

Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 May 2010

The claimants had overpaid large sums of VAT over several years, and been, eventually, refunded, with simple interest. The claimants now said that the interest should have been compounded. The revenue contended that such a claim was excluded under European law. Held: As a matter of statutory construction, the claims were excluded by sections 78 … Continue reading Littlewoods Retail Ltd and Others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 May 2010

FJ Chalke Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: ChD 8 May 2009

The court was asked as to the effectiveness under European law of sections 78 and 80 of the 1994 Act. Held: Henderson J focused on the fact that section 80(7) excludes any common law liability to repay the overpaid VAT, and inferred that it must also exclude any common law liability to pay interest: ‘the … Continue reading FJ Chalke Ltd and Another v Revenue and Customs: ChD 8 May 2009

Longborough Festival Opera v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 27 Jan 2006

The charitable company sought tax exemption as an eligible body supplying music of a cultural nature. Held: the company’s artciles prohibited distribution of profits, and the management as by directors having no financial interest. Judges: Lightman J Citations: [2006] EWHC 40 (Ch), Times 06-Feb-2006 Links: Bailii Statutes: Tribunals and Enquiries Act 1992 11, Value Added … Continue reading Longborough Festival Opera v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 27 Jan 2006

Krystal Hosting Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Nov 2020

VALUE ADDED TAX – VAT Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS) Scheme – Cancellation of registration -whether the appellant had persistently failed to comply with its obligations – paragraph 7(e) Schedule 3BA Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether HMRC had issued reminders in relation to late VAT returns in accordance with Article 58b(2)(a) and Article … Continue reading Krystal Hosting Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 4 Nov 2020

Da Costa and Co (a Firm) and Collins v Thames Magistrates Court and H M Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 25 Jan 2002

The claimant sought to challenge search warrants issued by the respondents. The warrants were criticised as being too widely drawn, and in breach of the 1984 Act. Criticism was also made of the implementation of the searches, in the use of excess numbers of officers, and the taking of images of hard disks, thus acquiring … Continue reading Da Costa and Co (a Firm) and Collins v Thames Magistrates Court and H M Commissioners of Customs and Excise: QBD 25 Jan 2002

Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v the Commissioners of HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 Jun 2007

The taxpayer had made a trasnfer of engagements. There was due to it a sum for overpayment of VAT. The revenue said that the claim could not be transferred. Held: the taxpayer’s appeal succeeded. Nothing in the statutory code operated to make such a transfer impossible. Judges: Blackburne J Citations: [2007] EWHC 1432 (Ch), Times … Continue reading Midlands Co-Operative Society Ltd v the Commissioners of HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 19 Jun 2007

Star Services Oxford Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 22 Aug 2022

Vat – Lease Rental Invoices – whether the requirements of s 24 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 and reg. 111 of the Value Added Tax Regulations 1995 were met – no – whether the Appellant held a valid VAT invoice which entitled it to claim input tax – no — appeal dismissed Citations: … Continue reading Star Services Oxford Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 22 Aug 2022

Colaingrove Ltd v the Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 19 Feb 2004

The taxpayer licensed static caravans on seasonal pitches on its land. They claimed exemption from charging VAT on the basis that they were residential lettings exempt under European legislation. Held: The appeal failed. The legislation exempted the purchase of static caravans, but explicilty not ‘the supply of accomodation in a caravan or houseboat.’ There was … Continue reading Colaingrove Ltd v the Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 19 Feb 2004

Leyton Sixth Form College v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Nov 2013

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – construction of buildings – whether zero-rated or standard-rated supplies – whether construction of a building by a college was an enlargement of, or an extension to, an existing building, or the construction of an annexe to an existing building – whether, if an annexe, it was capable of functioning independently … Continue reading Leyton Sixth Form College v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 13 Nov 2013

UK Storage Company (Sw) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Aug 2011

FTTTx VAT – Item 1 of Group 1, Sch 9 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether licence to occupy land an exempt supply or standard rated supply of storage facilities – whether storage units ‘immovable property’ – predominant purpose of supply Citations: [2011] UKFTT 549 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: … Continue reading UK Storage Company (Sw) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 12 Aug 2011

Kalron Foods Ltd v Revenue and Customs: ChD 30 Mar 2007

Appeal against finding that Kalron’s product, ‘Zumo Fresh Blend’ is a ‘beverage’ within Item No 4 of the Excepted items in Part 2 Group 1 Schedule 8 Value Added Tax Act 1994 (‘VATA’) and thus standard rated. Judges: Warren J Citations: [2007] EWHC 695 (Ch) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 02 September … Continue reading Kalron Foods Ltd v Revenue and Customs: ChD 30 Mar 2007

College of Estate Management v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 11 Aug 2004

When offering courses to distance learning students, the College offered materials for the courses. As part of the course this supply would be exempt, as books, the supply would be zero-rated, but the taxpayer would be able to reclaim its VAT inputs. Held: ‘There clearly was a separate supply of goods, namely the printed material … Continue reading College of Estate Management v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 11 Aug 2004

Nabarro v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 May 2014

FTTTx VAT – Reduced Rate – Whether ‘qualifying conversion’ – Whether one or two dwellings – Whether single building – Items 1 and 2 Group 6 and Note 3(1)(a) Schedule 7A Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Appeal allowed Citations: [2014] UKFTT 633 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT, Construction Updated: 31 August … Continue reading Nabarro v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 9 May 2014

Glaxosmithkline Services Unlimited v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 Sep 2010

VALUE ADDED TAX – Zero-rating – Food – Food of a kind used for human consumption – Beverage – Lucozade Sport – Taxpayer producing and selling sports drink containing carbohydrates and electrolytes – Designed to provide energy to persons engaged in high intensity sport and exercise – Whether product zero-rated as food or standard-rated as … Continue reading Glaxosmithkline Services Unlimited v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 3 Sep 2010

Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 18 Aug 2010

FTTTx VAT – Time limit for making assessments – section 76(6) VATA – HMRC requested information after the expiry of the 2-year period provided for by section 76(6)(a), when they could have requested it within that time period – whether the receipt of that information pursuant to such requests caused the one-year period provided for … Continue reading Weight Watchers (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 18 Aug 2010

Pinnacle Office Equipment Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 May 2010

VALUE ADDED TAX RETURN – failure to furnish return – misdeclaration – failure to pay tax due – reasonable excuse – reliance on any other person – reliance on employed accountant – accountant responsible for late payment and misdeclaration – whether accountant’s ill health reasonable excuse for default – Value Added Tax Act 1994, section … Continue reading Pinnacle Office Equipment Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 11 May 2010

Newnham College Cambridge v Revenue and Customs: CA 24 Mar 2006

The College had decided to demolish and rebuild its library. It elected to waive exemption to VAT so as to recover the VAT on its rebuilding costs. It had set up and funded an independent company to carry out the works, granting it a lease of the site. It appealed a decision of the tribunal … Continue reading Newnham College Cambridge v Revenue and Customs: CA 24 Mar 2006

Revenue and Customs v Netbusters (UK) Limited: UTTc 5 Jul 2022

VAT – classification of single composite supply – objective character or economic reality – supply of pitch hire, a licence to occupy football and netball pitches or the supply of competitive 5 or 7-a-side league matches – grant of any interest in or right over land or of any licence to occupy land for the … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Netbusters (UK) Limited: UTTc 5 Jul 2022

Conservatory Roofing UK Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTc 11 Jul 2022

Whether FTT decision (concerning whether supplies of works in relation to conservatory roofs fell within Note 1(a) to Schedule 7A of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (‘insulation for…roofs’)) was inadequately reasoned – yes – appeal allowed – case remitted to FTT Citations: [2022] UKUT 182 (TCC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: … Continue reading Conservatory Roofing UK Ltd v Revenue and Customs: UTTc 11 Jul 2022

Clark (T/A Maxim) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 8 Jan 2010

FTTTx VALUE ADDED TAX – appeal against notice of requirement for security for VAT – business of recruitment and supply of temporary staff – whether HMRC acted reasonably in requiring security – para 4 (2) of Schedule 11 VATA 1994 – appeal dismissed Citations: [2010] UKFTT 10 (TC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act … Continue reading Clark (T/A Maxim) v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 8 Jan 2010

BUPA Purchasing Ltd. and others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 8 Oct 2005

Parliament does not necessarily set out in a statute matters which are governed by the general law. Judges: Park J Citations: [2005] EWHC 2117 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm and Disability Rights Commission CA 25-Jul-2007 The court … Continue reading BUPA Purchasing Ltd. and others v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 8 Oct 2005

Khan v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 23 Feb 2006

The taxpayer appealed against the dismissal of his appeal from a decision of the commissioners. He said that he had been represented at the appeal by an accountant rather than by a lawyer because he was ignorant of a right to publicly funded assistance. Held: Since the accountant could properly appear to represent his client, … Continue reading Khan v HM Revenue and Customs: CA 23 Feb 2006

Kahal Imrei Chaim Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 15 Jun 2006

VALUE ADDED TAX – Zero-rating – Value Added Tax Act 1994, Sch 8, Group 5, Building works – Supply of services in the course of construction of a new synagogue in garden of old synagogue and house next door – Whether zero-rated? – Held yes – Appeal allowed Citations: [2006] UKVAT V19625 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: … Continue reading Kahal Imrei Chaim Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 15 Jun 2006

Yau and others v Customs and Excise: CA 3 Jul 2001

The Court considered the applicability of the European Convention of Human Rights to VAT and Excise procedures, namely whether or not the imposition by the Commissioners of Customs and Excise of (ostensibly civil) penalties for alleged dishonest evasion of tax pursuant to S.60(1) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 and s.8(1) of the Finance … Continue reading Yau and others v Customs and Excise: CA 3 Jul 2001

Gray (T/A William Gray and Sons) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 7 Nov 2000

The trader carried on business as a builder both through a limited company and on his own account. He tried to apportion the businesses so that neither was registerable for VAT. In one period he exceeded the limit. He asked the commissioners to exercise their discretion not to register him retrospectively acknowledging that his turnover … Continue reading Gray (T/A William Gray and Sons) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 7 Nov 2000

Expert Witness Institute v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 12 Apr 2001

The 1990 Regulation, SI 1990 No 2854, should be construed in the light of the European Directive. The Institute was exempt from Value Added Tax. Its aims of promoting and supporting the proper administration of justice, and the early resolution of disputes, were sufficiently in the public interest, and so closely connected to the administration … Continue reading Expert Witness Institute v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 12 Apr 2001

Hills and Another v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 25 Apr 2016

UTTC VALUE ADDED TAX – option to tax- whether supply of land taxable at standard rate because option to tax validly exercised – whether prior permission from HMRC required for late election – whether HMRC can validly dispense with this requirement for prior permission – paragraph 3 (9) and paragraph 30 Schedule 10 Value Added … Continue reading Hills and Another v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 25 Apr 2016

Grand Entertainments Company v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 3 May 2016

UTTC Claims for repayment of VAT – whether further claims for refunds were amendments to an earlier claim made within the time prescribed by s. 121 Finance Act 2008, or were separate claims out of time and barred by s. 80(4) Value Added Tax Act 1994 – held that the claims were separate claims and … Continue reading Grand Entertainments Company v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 3 May 2016

Banbury Visionplus Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 9 May 2006

Appeal against termination of special exemption method. Held: The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed. The VAT tribunal’s jurisdiction was unlimited. No limitation was implied by the wording of the section. The tribunal’s discretion had only to be exercised so as to achieve the statutory objective, There was nothing to exclude the jurisdiction of the tribunal to … Continue reading Banbury Visionplus Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 9 May 2006

Charterhall Marketing Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 19 Apr 2005

Zero Rating; single or multiple supplies; printed materials consisting of letter and leaflets, and envelope; mail pack; whether ‘letter’ truly a letter; whether one or more documents ancillary to another; Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 8 Group 3 Item 1 Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19050 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 04 August … Continue reading Charterhall Marketing Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 19 Apr 2005

Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 11 Mar 1999

Where a body regulated a profession by virtue of a statutory regime, the fees charged by that body to its members were not subject to VAT. Promoting and supervising professional standards is not an ‘economic activity’ within the meaning of the Act. Citations: Times 29-Mar-1999, Gazette 19-May-1999, [1999] UKHL 19; [1999] 2 All ER 449; … Continue reading Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: HL 11 Mar 1999

Investment Trust Companies v Revenue and Customs: ChD 26 Mar 2013

The claimant investment Trust companies sought repayment of taxes paid in error by way of restitution. Held: The range of the the law of restitution to recover any tax unlawfully exacted was to be be restricted to those situations where the sums paid to the public authority were so paid in fulfilment of an apparent … Continue reading Investment Trust Companies v Revenue and Customs: ChD 26 Mar 2013

Zenith Publishing Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 13 Mar 2009

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – Input tax – Whether sums paid by Director of company defending a claim against him in his private capacity are properly incurred for the purposes of the business – s.24 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Appeal dismissed Citations: [2009] UKVAT V20973 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 … Continue reading Zenith Publishing Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 13 Mar 2009

Insurancewide.Com Services Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 15 May 2009

The taxpayers appealed against a finding that their business did not fall within the exemption from VAT of insurance brokers. They introduced possible customers to insurance companies via web-sites. Held: The company’s activities were in the nature of insurance brokers, and the business was within the scope of the exemption. Judges: Sir Edward Evans-Lombe Citations: … Continue reading Insurancewide.Com Services Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 15 May 2009

D’Jan v Customs and Excise: VDT 25 Apr 2005

PENALTY – Evasion – S.60 and S.61 of Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Appellant director of clothing manufacturer – Whether invoices from another company amounting to half of Appellant’s company’s output genuine – Appeal dismissed Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19045 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 26 July 2022; Ref: scu.225138

Wraith v Revenue and Customs: VDT 29 Jan 2009

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – appeal against notice of requirement for security for VAT – public house – whether Customs acted reasonably in requiring security – para. 4(2) of Schedule 11, VATA 1994 – appeal dismissed Judges: I Vellins Citations: [2009] UKVAT V20944 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 VAT Updated: 23 July … Continue reading Wraith v Revenue and Customs: VDT 29 Jan 2009

HM Revenue and Customs v Lt Cmdr Colin Stone; The Kei: ChD 5 Jun 2008

The taxpayer had imported a newly built Dutch Barge. The Revenue appealed a decision that VAT was not payable on that import. He had claimed exemption on the basis that it was a ship exceeding 15 tons and not designed or adapted for leisure use. Held: The appeal failed. ‘the Kei was designed and constructed … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Lt Cmdr Colin Stone; The Kei: ChD 5 Jun 2008

Thamesdown Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 16 Dec 2005

VAT – Assessment – Whether supply of transport of passengers or making of arrangements for transport of passengers – Sch 8 Grp 8, Item 4 and Item 10 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – No – Agreement or undertaking to provide transport of passengers – Standard rated – Appeal dismissed Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19386 Links: … Continue reading Thamesdown Transport Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 16 Dec 2005

Oxfam v Revenue and Customs: VDT 30 Jul 2008

VDT VAT – INPUT TAX – Charity applying method apportioning VAT to business purposes – Church of England Children’s Society decision permitted the Appellant to recover part of VAT incurred on unrestricted fundraising expenditure – Appellant submitted a claim for input tax contending that the Church of England Children’s Society decision re-defined the apportionment method … Continue reading Oxfam v Revenue and Customs: VDT 30 Jul 2008

Sydenham Commercial Property Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 10 Jun 2008

VDT Transfer of going concern; sale of heritable property held as an investment by private limited company to two individuals; exercise of option to tax; whether individuals intended to carry on similar business; no; Value Added Tax Act 1994 section 4, Schedule 9, Group 1; The Value Added Tax (Special Provisions) Order 1995; HMRC Notice … Continue reading Sydenham Commercial Property Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 10 Jun 2008

Collins v Revenue and Customs: VDT 27 Apr 2006

VAT – DIY BUILDERS SCHEME – Appellant converted a music room into a semi-detached three bedroom dwelling – the music room had previously been a forge comprised within a converted stable block – section 106 agreement preventing the separate disposal of the three bedroom house – the conversion did not meet the requirements of a … Continue reading Collins v Revenue and Customs: VDT 27 Apr 2006

The Test Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Dec 2014

The company claimants had paid large sums in excess tax under a mistake of European law. Judges: Henderson J Citations: [2014] EWHC 4302 (Ch), [2015] BTC 3, [2015] STI 49, [2015] STC 1471 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 94 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: See Also – Test Claimants In The FII … Continue reading The Test Claimants In The FII Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs: ChD 18 Dec 2014

Procter and Gamble UK v Revenue and Customs (Including Supplemental Judgment): ChD 4 Jul 2008

Whether Regular Pringles are standard-rated as being within the words ‘potato crisps, potato sticks, potato puffs and similar products made from the potato, or from potato flour, or from potato starch’ in excepted item 5 of Group 1 of Schedule 8 to the VAT Act 1994. Held: They were not potato products and were zero-rated … Continue reading Procter and Gamble UK v Revenue and Customs (Including Supplemental Judgment): ChD 4 Jul 2008

James v Revenue and Customs: VDT 9 Nov 2007

VDT ZERO-RATING – Construction of building – Dwelling house – Self-build construction of house for own occupation – Defective plasterwork installed by contractor – Complete replacement plastering required – Whether supply of new plastering service after ‘Certificate of Completion’ a supply in the course of construction of a new dwelling – Yes – Whether that … Continue reading James v Revenue and Customs: VDT 9 Nov 2007

R Twining and Company Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 5 Jul 2007

VDT Value added tax – zero-rating – whether product a powder for the preparation of beverages – whether product a preparation or extract of milk – meaning of milk considered – Value Added Tax Act 1994, Schedule 8, Part II, Group 1 Citations: [2007] UKVAT V20230 Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 11 … Continue reading R Twining and Company Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 5 Jul 2007

Total Network Sl v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 31 Jan 2007

The defendants suspected a carousel VAT fraud. The defendants appealed a finding that there was a viable cause of action alleging a ‘conspiracy where the unlawful means alleged is a common law offence of cheating the public revenue’. The defendants argued (inter alia) that the attempted recovery was void under the Billl of Rights. Held: … Continue reading Total Network Sl v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 31 Jan 2007

Bennett v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 2): ChD 27 Feb 2001

There was nothing to prevent the Commissioners withdrawing one assessment and replacing it with another even after an adjudication on the first by a tribunal, but they could not do this in such a way as to attempt to relitigate the issues determined. Citations: Gazette 29-Mar-2001, Times 27-Feb-2001 Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 73, … Continue reading Bennett v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (No 2): ChD 27 Feb 2001

Languard New Homes Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Zero-Rating : Building Work): FTTTx 25 Feb 2016

VALUE ADDED TAX – Section 30 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Group 5 of Schedule 8 to that Act – conversion of property – grant of first major interest – whether grant is zero-rated supply – yes – appeal allowed Citations: [2016] UKFTT 129 (TC) Links: Bailii Jurisdiction: England and Wales VAT Updated: 07 … Continue reading Languard New Homes Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Vat – Zero-Rating : Building Work): FTTTx 25 Feb 2016

Conde Nast Publications Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 11 Jul 2006

Time limits for reclaim of VAT. The Court considered an argument that it should treat the Court of Appeal decision in Fleming (t/a Bodycraft) v Customs and Excise Commissioners [2006] STC 864 as inconsistent with EU law. Held: Chadwick LJ said: ‘I am content to assume that there may be circumstances in which the obligation … Continue reading Conde Nast Publications Ltd v Revenue and Customs: CA 11 Jul 2006

Revenue and Customs v Zurich Insurance Company: ChD 23 Mar 2006

Consultancy services had been carried out in the UK for the UK brancjh of a Swiss coimpany. The contract was made in Switzerland, and the VAT invoice was issued there also. Held: The UK branch of the company was liable for VAT. Judges: Park J Citations: [2006] EWHC 593 (Ch), Times 26-Apr-2006 Links: Bailii Statutes: … Continue reading Revenue and Customs v Zurich Insurance Company: ChD 23 Mar 2006

Bond House Systems Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 8 May 2003

The Tribunal described the general nature of a carousel fraud: ‘In its simplest form a carousel fraud works in this way. A VAT-registered trader, A, in one European Union member state sells taxable goods to a VAT-registered trader, B, in another member state. A’s sale to B is zero-rated in A’s member state’. ‘According to … Continue reading Bond House Systems Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 8 May 2003

Hooper v Revenue and Customs: VDT 6 Oct 2005

VDT Value added tax – input tax – business purpose – whether input tax on car registration number purchased from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency recoverable – Value Added Tax Act 1994, section 24 – decision on the facts – yes Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19276 Links: Bailii VAT Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.238005

Stephen v Revenue and Customs: VDT 28 Oct 2005

VDT ASSESSMENT -whether amount of tax due assessed to the best judgment of Customs – whether assessment excessive – appeal dismissed – VATA 1994 s73(1) Citations: [2005] UKVAT V19316 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 73(1) VAT Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.238023

Willis Pension Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Jul 2005

VDT Supply for a consideration – whether foreign exchange transactions always constitute such supplies by both parties – whether a counterparty’s profit from foreign exchange transactions is consideration for its supply – Value Added Tax Act 1994 section 5(2) – Sixth Directive Articles 2 and 11. Interpretation of the operative part of a preliminary ruling … Continue reading Willis Pension Trustees Ltd v Revenue and Customs: VDT 25 Jul 2005

Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra v Customs and Excise: ChD 21 Jul 2005

The Orchestra claimed exemption from VAT as a voluntary body supplying cultural services. The respondent argued that since the administrator was paid, the body was not voluntary. Held: The board operated as would a commercial company. All members were voluntary save the managing director who was paid. Where the remuneration of a board member was … Continue reading Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra v Customs and Excise: ChD 21 Jul 2005

Coudrat v Revenue and Customs: CA 26 May 2005

The claimant appealed against dismissal of his claim for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution against the Customs and Excise. He was arrested and held accused of VAT fraud. Proceedings were discontinued. He had signed an application for registration for VAT for a company for whom he worked as an independent agent. The judge concluded that … Continue reading Coudrat v Revenue and Customs: CA 26 May 2005

Empowerment Enterprises Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 21 Feb 2005

Exempt Supplies – education; tuition given privately by teacher, who is director and employee of limited company; EC Sixth Directive Article 13A.1(j); whether properly implemented by domestic legislation by Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 9 group 6 item 2; whether domestic legislation compatible with EC Sixth Directive; No; appeal allowed. Citations: [2005] UKVAT V18963 … Continue reading Empowerment Enterprises Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 21 Feb 2005

Loyalty Management UK Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 6 Apr 2005

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – the Appellant operates the Nectar programme under which customers who purchase goods (called primary goods) from certain retailers receive points which they may use to acquire goods (called secondary goods) from other suppliers – the Appellant pays the supplier for the secondary goods – whether, when a … Continue reading Loyalty Management UK Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 6 Apr 2005

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 17 Oct 2001

The respondent controlled a VAT group of companies. Its shareholding in TDL was transferred to a charitable trust, and the Commissioners were informed that it was no longer a member of the group. The commissioners contended that it remained a member up to the end of the accounting period. Held: The provisions of the Act … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 17 Oct 2001

University of Sussex v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 10 Oct 2001

The taxpayer had made a considered decision not to deduct certain input VAT claims against its payments made over a long period of time up to 1996. They later concluded that they should have made the deductions, and claimed them. The Commissioners asserted that the claims were now statute barred. Held: If the claim had … Continue reading University of Sussex v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: ChD 10 Oct 2001

Courts Plc v Customs and Excise: CA 17 Nov 2004

Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1527 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Primback Ltd v Commissioners of Customs and Excise CA 30-Apr-1996 A retailer giving a discount was liable for Vat only on the discounted finance price, not on the full retail price. . . Lists of … Continue reading Courts Plc v Customs and Excise: CA 17 Nov 2004

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Pal and Others: ChD 31 Jul 2006

The taxpayers had challenged an assessment to VAT saying that they were not actually partners in the company assessed. The revenue countered to say that they had signed the registration form to say that they were partners. The revenue now appealed a decision in the taxpayers’ favour. Held: The appeal failed. The partners were partners … Continue reading Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Pal and Others: ChD 31 Jul 2006

King v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 19 Jan 2012

VALUE ADDED TAX – Claims for Input Tax – Vehicles – Fuel Charge – Miscellaneous – Sections 24 and 56 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether expenditure allowable as input tax – whether qualifying motor cars – Article 7, VAT (Input Tax) Order 1992 – Appeal dismissed. Citations: [2012] UKFTT 64 (TC) Links: Bailii … Continue reading King v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 19 Jan 2012

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: ChD 12 Jul 2002

The tax payer had converted a building which had had both residential and business uses into residential use, and sought to reclaim the input tax on that part of the expenditure attributable to the residential part. The Commissioners appealed. Held: The tribunal was correct. There was no need to restrict the availability to wholly residential … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Blom-Cooper: ChD 12 Jul 2002

Opal Carleton Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Jul 2010

VAT – reduced rate- student accommodation – whether ‘residential accommodation for students’ liable to VAT at standard rate or ‘ changed number of dwelling conversion’ liable to VAT at reduced rate – Value Added Tax Act 1994 Schedule 7A – over-arching development student accommodation – VAT at standard Rate- appeal dismissed Citations: [2010] UKFTT 353 … Continue reading Opal Carleton Ltd v Revenue and Customs: FTTTx 29 Jul 2010

The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 1 Apr 2019

VALUE ADDED TAX – s80 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 – whether appellant made a valid claim under s80(1B) – the nature of set-off between input and output tax – ‘set-off’ provisions under s81(3) and s81(3A) Citations: [2019] UKUT 100 (TCC) Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 80 Jurisdiction: England and … Continue reading The Rank Group Plc v Revenue and Customs: UTTC 1 Apr 2019

Khaira (T/A Tony Fish Bar) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 6 Apr 2006

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – Assessment in default of proper returns by the taxpayer – Allegation by Commissioners that Appellant incorrectly apportioned supplies and suppressed takings – Assessment to the Commissioners best judgment – Value Added Tax Act 1994, s.73(1) – Appeal dismissedCIVIL EVASION PENALTY – Evasion of tax – Conduct involving dishonesty – Value … Continue reading Khaira (T/A Tony Fish Bar) v Revenue and Customs: VDT 6 Apr 2006

Trinity Mirror plc (formerly Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 25 Jan 2001

The issue by a company of shares is a supply of services for the purposes of VAT. The issue of shares was ‘something done’ by the company, as required by the Directive. The consideration received for such shares was part of the company’s turnover, and therefore a VATable supply. Citations: Gazette 05-Apr-2001, Times 06-Mar-2001, [2001] … Continue reading Trinity Mirror plc (formerly Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd) v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 25 Jan 2001

Commissioners of Customs and Excise, HM Attorney General v Federation of Technological Industries And 53 others: CA 30 Jul 2004

Judges: Lord Justice Ward Lord Justice Jacob Citations: [2004] EWCA Civ 1020 Links: Bailii Statutes: Value Added Tax Act 1994 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Citing: Cited – Federation of Technological Industries and Others, Regina (on the Application Of) v Customs and Excise and Another Admn 18-Feb-2004 . . Lists of cited by and citing cases … Continue reading Commissioners of Customs and Excise, HM Attorney General v Federation of Technological Industries And 53 others: CA 30 Jul 2004

Zen Internet Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 5 Apr 2004

VDT VALUE ADDED TAX – dishonest evasion – VATA s 60 – appellant paying six successive centrally-issued assessments for less than the true liability – inadequate attempts to put accounting records in order – whether ‘dishonest’ – yes – appeal dismissed but reduction for mitigation increased Judges: Colin Bishopp C Citations: [2004] UKVAT V18563 Links: … Continue reading Zen Internet Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 5 Apr 2004

Global Vehicle (UK) Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 26 Mar 2004

VDT VAT – Default surcharge – s.59 VATA 1994 – Whether a reasonable excuse was shown – Misdirection by an officer relied on by the Appellant, to the effect that a late payment of VAT in specified circumstances would not attract a surcharge – Finding that no misdirection established – Held no reasonable excuse shown … Continue reading Global Vehicle (UK) Ltd v Customs and Excise: VDT 26 Mar 2004

DFS Furniture Company Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 16 Mar 2004

The taxpayers said that the Commissioners’ assessment to VAT was out of time, and appealed a finding that it was not. They said that time should run from the point at which the Commissioners knew the facts upon which the assessment was based. The Commissioners argued that time could not begin to run until the … Continue reading DFS Furniture Company Plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise: CA 16 Mar 2004

Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Zielinski Baker and Partners Limited: HL 26 Feb 2004

The commissioners sought to charge to VAT charges for works which had been carried out to a building within the curtilage of a listed building. The taxpayer sought zero-rating. Held: The outbuilding to which alterations were made must have been a ‘protected building’. Note (1) defines a protected building as both ‘a building which is … Continue reading Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Zielinski Baker and Partners Limited: HL 26 Feb 2004