Search Results for: European Convention on Human Rights 810

Click the case name for better results:

Silka v Ukraine: ECHR 18 Jan 2007

Citations: 3624/03, [2007] ECHR 73 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 04 September 2022; Ref: scu.248104

Vusic v Croatia: ECHR 1 Jul 2010

Citations: 48101/07, [2010] ECHR 1020 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.420169

Solmaz v Turkey: ECHR 16 Jan 2007

Citations: 27561/02, [2007] ECHR 51 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 02 September 2022; Ref: scu.248106

Shchiglitsov v Estonia: ECHR 18 Jan 2007

Citations: 35062/03, [2007] ECHR 68, [2009] ECHR 1755 Links: Bailii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 01 September 2022; Ref: scu.248103

Sitkov v Russia: ECHR 18 Jan 2007

Citations: 55531/00, [2007] ECHR 67 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 31 August 2022; Ref: scu.248105

Nevolin v Russia: ECHR 12 Jul 2007

Citations: 38103/05, [2007] ECHR 599 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 19 August 2022; Ref: scu.258260

Geerings v The Netherlands: ECHR 1 Mar 2007

Where a defendant is acquitted of offences of which he was charged, it was not legitimate then to infer that he had benefitted from those offences for confiscation proceedings. Citations: 30810/03, [2007] ECHR 191, (2007) 46 EHRR 1222 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Briggs-Price, Regina … Continue reading Geerings v The Netherlands: ECHR 1 Mar 2007

McDonagh, Regina (on The Application of) v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary: Admn 19 Dec 2013

The claimant alleged that his treatment in the police station had been wrongful. His solicitor, representing two clients, had refused to attend the interview with the claimant until he had seen the second client. There was a scene and the solicitor was excluded. The claimant said that this had unlawfully imposed a condition on his … Continue reading McDonagh, Regina (on The Application of) v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary: Admn 19 Dec 2013

Kijowski v Poland: ECHR 5 Apr 2011

Citations: 33829/07, [2011] ECHR 590 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 26 July 2022; Ref: scu.431810

Jeunesse v The Netherlands: ECHR 3 Oct 2014

(Grand Chamber) Although the applicant had married and had three children while her immigration status in the Netherlands was precarious, there were exceptional circumstances such that a fair balance had not been struck between the competing interests involved: the husband and three children were all citizens of the Netherlands with the right to enjoy family … Continue reading Jeunesse v The Netherlands: ECHR 3 Oct 2014

In re Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others; HM Treasury v Ahmed and Others: SC 27 Jan 2010

Proceedings had been brought to challenge the validity of Orders in Council which had frozen the assets of the claimants in those proceedings. Ancillary orders were made and confirmed requiring them not to be identified. As the cases came to the Supreme Court, applications were also now made to lift the anonymity orders. Held: The … Continue reading In re Guardian News and Media Ltd and Others; HM Treasury v Ahmed and Others: SC 27 Jan 2010

Begovic v Croatia: ECHR 13 Jun 2019

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : First Section Committee Citations: 35810/14, [2019] ECHR 452 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 12 July 2022; Ref: scu.638847

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF AN and AE (No 3): HL 10 Jun 2009

The applicants complained that they had been made subject to non-derogating control orders as suspected terrorists, but that the failure to inform them of the allegations or evidence against them was unfair and infringed their human rights. The material was withheld in the interests of national security. Held: The failure to supply the defendants with … Continue reading Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF AN and AE (No 3): HL 10 Jun 2009

Maurice v France: ECHR 6 Oct 2005

ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of P1-1; No separate issue under Art.14 in conjunction with P1-1; No separate issue under Art. 6-1; No violation of Art. 13; No violation of Art. 8; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention and domestic proceedings; Just satisfaction reserved. Citations: 11810/03, [2005] ECHR 683 Links: Worldlii, … Continue reading Maurice v France: ECHR 6 Oct 2005

Trippel v Germany: ECHR 4 Dec 2003

Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage – claim rejected ; Non-pecuniary damage – financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings Citations: 68103/01, [2003] ECHR 666 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190196

Regina (R) v Mersey Care NHS Trust: QBD 7 Aug 2002

The claimant complained that her continued detention for mental health treatment contravened her human rights. She had been detained compulsorily for treatment. A later assessment provided that she could be at home, with a right to by required to continue treatment as an inpatient. Held: The fact that a continued substantial part of her treatment … Continue reading Regina (R) v Mersey Care NHS Trust: QBD 7 Aug 2002

HFB and others v Commission: ECFI 20 Mar 2002

1. During the proceedings before the Community Courts internal Commission documents are not to be communicated to the applicants, unless the circumstances of the case are exceptional and the applicants make out a plausible case for the need to do so. That is the case as regards the expert accountant’s report, whose purpose, as a … Continue reading HFB and others v Commission: ECFI 20 Mar 2002

Guerra and Others v Italy: ECHR 19 Feb 1998

(Grand Chamber) The applicants lived about 1km from a chemical factory which produced fertilizers and other chemicals and was classified as ‘high risk’ in criteria set out by Presidential Decree. Held: Failure by a government to release to an affected population details of known pollution risks could amount to breach of their human rights: ‘The … Continue reading Guerra and Others v Italy: ECHR 19 Feb 1998

Jalloh v Germany: ECHR 3 Jun 2010

The claimant complained that the police had administered an emetic to recover drugs evidence he was said to have swallowed. Citations: [2010] ECHR 947, 54810/00 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate SC 26-Oct-2010 Statement without lawyer access was inadmissible The accused … Continue reading Jalloh v Germany: ECHR 3 Jun 2010

X v United Kingdom: ECHR 3 Oct 1975

The applicant, a serving prisoner, complained that he had been excluded from voting in the referendum on the British membership of the EEC. Held: Article 10 does not guarantee a right to vote as such. Article 3 Protocol 1 : the obligations of the High Contracting Parties under this provision are limited to the field … Continue reading X v United Kingdom: ECHR 3 Oct 1975

Butler v United Kingdom: ECHR 27 Jun 2002

A substantial confiscation order was made with respect to money seized from the applicant on the ground that customs officers believed the money was directly or indirectly the proceeds of drugs trafficking and/or was intended for use in drug trafficking. The applicant contended that a court, when considering whether to make a forfeiture order in … Continue reading Butler v United Kingdom: ECHR 27 Jun 2002

Mamatkulov and Abdurasulovic v Turkey: ECHR 6 Feb 2003

A retrospective complaint of extradition to Uzbekistan was made. The applicants sought to resist their extradition from Turkey to Uzbekistan, saying they would be tortured. Held: Convention states must comply with orders made by the European Court of Human Rights. Turkey had failed to comply with interim measures ordered and was in breach of its … Continue reading Mamatkulov and Abdurasulovic v Turkey: ECHR 6 Feb 2003

Fernandes De Oliveira v Portugal: ECHR 31 Jan 2019

ECHR Judgment : Remainder inadmissible : Grand Chamber In the particular context of healthcare it requires the State to ‘make regulations compelling hospitals, whether private or public, to adopt appropriate measures for the protection of patients’ lives.’ The Court continued at [107]: ‘The question whether there has been a failure by the State to comply … Continue reading Fernandes De Oliveira v Portugal: ECHR 31 Jan 2019

Sisojeva And Others v Latvia: ECHR 15 Jan 2007

Grand Chamber – There was insufficient evidence that the questioning by security police in the circumstances: ‘should be regarded as a form of ‘pressure’, ‘intimidation’ or ‘harassment’ which might have induced the applicants to withdraw or modify their application or hindered them in any other way in the exercise of their right of individual petition.’ … Continue reading Sisojeva And Others v Latvia: ECHR 15 Jan 2007

Lunari v Italy: ECHR 11 Jan 2001

Citations: 21463/93, [2001] ECHR 10, [2001] ECHR 10 Links: Worldlii, Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights 6.1 Jurisdiction: Human Rights Cited by: Cited – Pulcini v Italy ECHR 17-Apr-2003 Hudoc Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Violation of P1-1 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage – financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage – financial … Continue reading Lunari v Italy: ECHR 11 Jan 2001

Genov v Bulgaria: ECHR 23 Mar 2017

The applicant alleged that the refusal of the courts to register as worship the association of which he was the president constituted an unjustified interference with his rights to freedom of religion and freedom of association. Citations: [2017] ECHR 275, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0323JUD004052408, 40524/08 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights … Continue reading Genov v Bulgaria: ECHR 23 Mar 2017

Kuzminas v Russia: ECHR 21 Dec 2021

ECHR Judgment : Article 8 – Right to respect for private and family life : Third Section Citations: 69810/11, [2021] ECHR 1123 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 24 March 2022; Ref: scu.671157

Bujak v Poland: ECHR 21 Mar 2017

Citations: 686/12 (Judgment : Violation of Article 3 – Prohibition of torture (Article 3 – Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) No v…), [2017] ECHR 265 Links: Bailii Statutes: European Convention on Human Rights Jurisdiction: Human Rights Human Rights Updated: 23 March 2022; Ref: scu.581034

RJM, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: HL 22 Oct 2008

The 1987 Regulations provided additional benefits for disabled persons, but excluded from benefit those who had nowhere to sleep. The claimant said this was irrational. He had been receiving the disability premium to his benefits, but this was cancelled when he lost his home. Held: The appeal was dismissed. The disabilty premium, as part of … Continue reading RJM, Regina (on the Application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: HL 22 Oct 2008

Maurice v France: ECHR 21 Jun 2006

11810/03, [2006] ECHR 639 Worldlii, Bailii European Convention on Human Rights Human Rights Citing: See Also – Maurice v France ECHR 2005 . . See Also – Maurice v France ECHR 6-Oct-2005 ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of P1-1; No separate issue under Art.14 in conjunction with P1-1; No separate issue under … Continue reading Maurice v France: ECHR 21 Jun 2006

Muller And Others v Switzerland: ECHR 24 May 1988

The Court considered a complaint that Article 10 had been infringed by the applicant’s conviction of an offence of publishing obscene items, consisting of paintings which were said ‘mostly to offend the sense of sexual propriety of persons of ordinary sensitivity’. Held: There was no breach of Article 10 ‘Artists and those who promote their … Continue reading Muller And Others v Switzerland: ECHR 24 May 1988

Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis: CA 21 May 2009

The appellant had been ostentatiously photographed by the police as he left a company general meeting. He was a peaceful and lawful objector to the Arms Trade. He appealed against refusal of an order for the records to be destroyed. The police had refused to disclose elements of their policies for overt photography. Held: The … Continue reading Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis: CA 21 May 2009