The parents appealed a refusal of the education authority to issue a statement of special needs. The tribunal remitted it to the local authority, who issued a second and similar decision. The parents sought to appeal again. They appealed the refusal of jurisdiction. They argued that the authority’s second decision was de novo and therefore attracted a new right of appeal. The court held that the only right of appeal was as stated in the section, and that the second decision was not a new decision.
Judges:
Kay J
Citations:
Gazette 13-Sep-2001
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal To – O v Harrow London Borough Council CA 18-Dec-2001
The applicant had appealed to the Special Educational Needs Tribunal. They had remitted the case to the authority for reconsideration, and the applicant again sought to appeal the authority’s decision to refuse a statement of special educational . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – O v Harrow London Borough Council CA 18-Dec-2001
The applicant had appealed to the Special Educational Needs Tribunal. They had remitted the case to the authority for reconsideration, and the applicant again sought to appeal the authority’s decision to refuse a statement of special educational . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Education
Updated: 29 May 2022; Ref: scu.163312
