The claimants sought injunctions to restrain the defendant search engine from listing details of historic convictions. They now sought anonymisation of the proceedings pending trial, and the court considered the form of that anonymisation.
Judges:
Warby J
Citations:
[2018] EWHC 261 (QB)
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – NT1 v Google Llc QBD 18-Jan-2018
An application was made at this pre-trial review, by the claimants in two actions, where they had already obtained orders to preserve their anonymity, for orders protecting that anonymity under the defendant’s search engine. . .
Cited by:
See Also – NT 1 and NT 2 v Google Llc QBD 13-Apr-2018
Right to be Forgotten is not absolute
The two claimants separately had criminal convictions from years before. They objected to the defendant indexing third party web pages which included personal data in the form of information about those convictions, which were now spent. The claims . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Media
Updated: 05 April 2022; Ref: scu.605802
