EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
Employment Tribunal refused to award expenses to Respondent notwithstanding having found that the Claimant’s dismissal was on account of what the Tribunal found could be described as his having defrauded the Respondent. On appeal, Tribunal’s decision set aside and a finding that the Respondent was entitled to an award of expenses substituted with the matter thereafter being remitted to a fresh Tribunal to determine the amount.
Judges:
Lady Smith
Citations:
[2010] UKEAT 0058 – 09 – 2306, [2010] IRLR 859
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – Yerrakalva v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and Another EAT 8-Dec-2010
EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs
Discrimination claim withdrawn – Judge awards Rs 100% of their costs, not on the basis that the claim had been misconceived or unreasonably pursued from the start but . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Costs
Updated: 21 August 2022; Ref: scu.421013
