Nahhas v Pier House (Cheyne Walk) Management Ltd: 1984

A payment by a third party insurance broker to the daughter of a valued client made for benevolent and commercial reasons did not reduce the claim on the tortfeasor a position which would also, should it have been necessary, have been justified by the ordinary principles of subrogation.

Judges:

Mr Denis Henry QC

Citations:

[1984] 1 EGLR 160, (1984) 270 EG 328

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Vicarious Liability

Updated: 11 May 2022; Ref: scu.538145