The court was asked the ‘vexed’ question of how the court should, when exercising its powers to award ancillary relief, reflect, if at all, the property that H had brought into the marriage back in 1993.
Judges:
Mostyn J
Citations:
[2011] EWHC 586 (Fam), [2011] 2 FLR 533
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – S v AG (Financial Remedy: Lottery Prize) FD 14-Oct-2011
The court considered how to treat a lottery win of andpound;500,000 in the context of an ancillary relief application on a divorce.
Held: The answers in such cases must be fact specific. ‘In the application of the sharing principle (as opposed . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Family
Updated: 09 July 2022; Ref: scu.431746