Mongoto v Secretary of State for the Home Department: CA 19 May 2005

Laws LJ referred to the argument that the applicant could derive ‘analogical support’ from the Concession, even though it did not in terms apply to him as a ‘spurious’ argument.
Ward, Laws, Smith LJJ
[2005] EWCA Civ 751
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedPatel and Others v Secretary of State for The Home Department SC 20-Nov-2013
The court was asked as to the respective duties of the Secretary of State and the First-tier Tribunal, on an appeal against refusal of an application to vary leave to enter or remain under the Immigration Act 1971, and more particularly as to the . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 24 January 2021; Ref: scu.227085