Molnlycke AB v Procter and Gamble Ltd: CA 1994

The court said that in patents cases, the primary evidence will be the opinion evidence of properly qualified expert witnesses, all other evidence being secondary to that primary evidence.

Citations:

[1994] RPC 49

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedSeb SAa v Societe De’Longhi Spa CA 4-Jul-2003
The claimant’s action for patent infringement had been dismissed on the basis that the patent was invalid for obviousness.
Held: There was material before the judge on which he could properly conclude as he did on the presence of common . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Intellectual Property, Evidence

Updated: 26 October 2022; Ref: scu.184326