EAT Working Time Regulations – An appeal by Ms Mitchell, Ms Lynn and Mr Nagulendran, part-time lecturers employed by the Respondent College, against a decision of the London (Central) Employment Tribunal promulgated with extended reasons on 22 March 2002, dismissing their complaints of failure to pay holiday pay contrary to the Working Time Regulations 1998 (the Regulations).
Judges:
His Honour Judge Peter Clark
Citations:
EAT/483/02, [2003] EAT 0483 – 02 – 3103, [2003] UKEAT 0483 – 02 – 3103
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Distinguished – Telephone Information Services v Wilkinson EAT 1991
The employee was dismissed. His employers offered to pay to him andpound;9,699, the maximum sum he could have been awarded if the matter went to the tribunal, but made no admission of liability. He rejected the offer, saying that he wanted the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 07 June 2022; Ref: scu.185505
