Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd: QBD 11 Nov 2011

[2011] EWHC 2677 (QB)
Bailii
Citing:
See AlsoMiller v Associated Newspapers Ltd QBD 11-Nov-2003
A policemen sued in defamation. The newspaper pleaded Reynolds qualified privilege.
Held: The plea was struck out. There has developed tendency of defendants to plead qualified privilege since the Reynolds decision in ‘rather waffly . .
See AlsoMiller v Associated Newspapers Ltd QBD 8-Apr-2005
. .
See AlsoMiller v Associated Newspapers Ltd QBD 31-Mar-2010
The claimant sought damages in defamation, saying that the defendant newspaper (Daily Mail) had implied abuse of his friendship with a Police Commissioner to obtain contracts. The defendant denied any meaning defamatory of the claimant.
Held: . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 March 2021; Ref: scu.449392