Micallef v Malta: ECHR 15 Oct 2009

‘The Court reiterates that for Article 6(1) in its ‘civil’ limb to be applicable, there must be a dispute over a ‘civil right’ which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law’
Preliminary proceedings or what are referred to as ‘interim measures’ do not normally determine civil rights
17056/06, [2009] ECHR 1571, [2010] 50 EHRR 37, [2011] ECHR 2153
Bailii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 6
See AlsoMicallef v Malta ECHR 15-Jan-2008
. .

Cited by:
AppliedBank Mellat v HM Treasury QBD 11-Jun-2010
The respondent had made an order under the Regulations restricting all persons from dealing with the the claimant bank. The bank applied to have the order set aside. Though the defendant originally believed that the Iranian government owned 80% of . .
CitedJIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd QBD 5-Nov-2010
The court was asked as to the circumstances under which the identity of a claimant should be protected in an action where he sought to restrain the publication of private information about him.
Held: Tugendhat J accepted the proposition . .
CitedBank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) SC 19-Jun-2013
The bank challenged measures taken by HM Treasury to restrict access to the United Kingdom’s financial markets by a major Iranian commercial bank, Bank Mellat, on the account of its alleged connection with Iran’s nuclear weapons and ballistic . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 06 February 2021; Ref: scu.264357