Mercer v Chief Constable of Lancashire: CA 1991

When justifying a detention, the Chief Constable must prove it ‘was lawful minute by minute and hour by hour’.

Judges:

Lord Donaldson MR

Citations:

[1991] 1 WLR 367

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedBranson v Snowden; Branson v Gtech UK Corporation (a Body Corporate) and Rendine CA 3-Jul-1997
The respective parties had been preparing competing bids for the National Lottery. One (Branson) alleged that the other had offerered a bribe. The other responded that the allegation was a lie, and each sued the other for defamation.
Held: The . .
CitedTaylor (A Child Proceeding By his Mother and Litigation Friend C M Taylor) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police CA 6-Jul-2004
The Chief Constable appealed aganst a finding that his officers had wrongfully arrested and imprisoned the claimant. The claimant was 10 years old when arrested, and complained that the officers had not properly advised him of the nature and purpose . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice, Police

Updated: 29 April 2022; Ref: scu.185965