Mentes and Others v Turkey: ECHR 28 Nov 1997

ECHR Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion); Not necessary to examine Art. 5; Not necessary to examine Art. 6; Violation of Art. 13; No violation of Art. 14; No violation of Art. 18; No violation of Art. 2; No violation of Art. 3; No violation of Art. 5; No violation of Art. 6; No violation of Art. 8; No violation of Art. 13; Costs and expenses partial award – Convention proceedings; Pecuniary damage – reserved; Non-pecuniary damage – reserved; Not necessary to examine Art. 3; Violation of Art. 8

Citations:

[1997] ECHR 98, 23186/94

Links:

Worldlii, Worldlii, Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Cited by:

See Also – Mentes and Others v Turkey ECHR 24-Jul-1998
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 04 June 2022; Ref: scu.165578