ECJ Opinion – Appeal – Rules adopted by the International Olympic Committee concerning doping control – Incompatibility with the Community rules on competition and freedom to provide services – Complaint – Rejection.
Judges:
Leger AG
Citations:
[2006] All ER (EC) 1057, [2006] ECR I-6991, [2006] 5 CMLR 18, C-519/04, [2006] EUECJ C-519/04
Links:
Jurisdiction:
European
Citing:
See Also – Meca-Medina and Majcen v Commission ECFI 30-Sep-2004
ECJ Competition – Freedom to provide services – Anti-doping legislation adopted by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) – Purely sporting legislation
The claimants were athletes who complained that . .
Cited by:
Cited – Chambers v British Olympic Association QBD 18-Jul-2008
The claimant, a former Olypmic sprinter had now competed a ban after being found to have taken banned drugs. He had returned to the sprort but now challenged the policy of the respondent not to allow for consideration of the Olympic team, athletes . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Commercial
Updated: 30 November 2022; Ref: scu.243415
