Skip to content

swarb.co.uk

May the law be with you – lex vobiscum

  • Law
    • More Recent Cases
    • e-Legal Gathering
    • Case Layout
    • FAQ
    • Searching
    • Areas of Law
    • law index
    • Courts
    • Reports
    • Judges
    • Case Names
  • Privacy
    • GDPR – Overall
    • Anonymity Orders
    • GDPR – Request to be ‘Forgotten’
    • Privacy – Users
    • GDPR – Content
    • GDPR – Legitimate Interests
    • Lawfulness of processing
    • Purposes Limitation
    • Cookie Policy
    • GDPR -Accuracy
    • GDPR – Resources
    • California Consumer Privacy Act
  • About
    • What we do
    • Contact
    • Development
  • Advertising
    • Advertising
    • Donate
    • Statistics
  • Registration

Mciver, Re Minimum Term: QBD 9 Sep 2005

[2005] EWHC 1935 (QB)
Bailii
England and Wales

Updated: 30 January 2021; Ref: scu.230013

Posted on January 30, 2021January 30, 2021 by dlsPosted in Criminal Sentencing

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Valentine v Allen and others: CA 9 Oct 2002
Next Next post: Taylor v OCS Group Ltd: CA 31 May 2006

Areas of Law:

  • Administrative (1,122)
  • Adoption (461)
  • Agency (620)
  • Agriculture (773)
  • Animals (305)
  • Arbitration (1,262)
  • Armed Forces (358)
  • Banking (1,416)
  • Benefits (3,521)
  • Capital Gains Tax (486)
  • Charity (383)
  • Child Support (309)
  • Children (5,385)
  • Civil Procedure Rules (319)
  • Commercial (1,424)
  • Commonwealth (3,082)
  • Company (3,025)
  • Constitutional (949)
  • Construction (1,173)
  • Consumer (740)
  • Contempt of Court (852)
  • Contract (6,114)
  • Coroners (421)
  • Corporation Tax (680)
  • Costs (3,553)
  • Crime (8,398)
  • Criminal Evidence (633)
  • Criminal Practice (3,315)
  • Criminal Sentencing (2,882)
  • Customs and Excise (1,686)
  • Damages (2,486)
  • Defamation (1,543)
  • Development (1)
  • Discrimination (2,630)
  • Ecclesiastical (307)
  • Education (1,063)
  • Elections (224)
  • Employment (12,725)
  • Environment (820)
  • Equity (961)
  • Estoppel (334)
  • European (12,960)
  • Evidence (517)
  • Extradition (1,589)
  • Family (2,883)
  • Financial Services (1,014)
  • Health (1,522)
  • Health and Safety (459)
  • Health Professions (1,928)
  • Housing (2,005)
  • Human Rights (19,661)
  • Immigration (56,354)
  • Income Tax (3,224)
  • Information (15,624)
  • Inheritance Tax (178)
  • Insolvency (3,044)
  • Insurance (1,249)
  • Intellectual Property (13,534)
  • International (956)
  • Ireland (18)
  • Judicial Review (584)
  • Jurisdiction (1,047)
  • Jury (1,775)
  • Land (5,294)
  • Landlord and Tenant (15,657)
  • Legal Aid (391)
  • Legal Professions (1,957)
  • Licensing (594)
  • Limitation (1,065)
  • Litigation Practice (7,051)
  • Local Government (1,630)
  • Magistrates (758)
  • Media (1,141)
  • Natural Justice (322)
  • Negligence (1,336)
  • News (49)
  • Northern Ireland (1,758)
  • Nuisance (460)
  • Personal Injury (2,907)
  • Planning (3,239)
  • Police (1,549)
  • Prisons (1,248)
  • Professional Negligence (1,619)
  • Rating (670)
  • Registered Land (823)
  • Road Traffic (1,211)
  • Scotland (16,745)
  • Stamp Duty (187)
  • Taxes – Other (2,256)
  • Taxes Management (1,381)
  • Torts – Other (2,759)
  • Transport (2,049)
  • Trusts (1,473)
  • Undue Influence (152)
  • Utilities (477)
  • VAT (5,534)
  • Vicarious Liability (248)
  • Wales (16)
  • Wills and Probate (1,781)

Recent Posts

  • Customflex Ltd v N S Peckitt – O/225/01: PO 8 May 2001
  • Whitehart v Raymond Thomson Ltd: EAT 11 Sep 1984
  • Regina v Shrewsbury Coroner’s Court ex parte British Parachute Association: QBD 21 Sep 1987
  • In re Manda: CA 1993
  • A County Council v W and others (Disclosure): FD 1997
  • Re Bishop, Dec’d: 1965
  • Re F: 1977
  • In re de Beaujeu’s Application: ChD 1949
  • Regina v Levin: CACD 29 Jan 2004
  • Campbell v Dunoon HA: OHCS 1993
  • Minet v Morgan: CA 1873
  • Van Gestel v Can: CA 7 Aug 1987
  • Regina v Jackson: CA 1891
  • Kelly v Liverpool Maritime Terminals Limited: CA 1988
  • Williams v Reason: 1988
  • Rootes v Shelton: 1965
  • Silkbill Ltd v Ash And Lacy Building Products: PO 11 Apr 2001
  • Churchill v Walton: CA 1967
  • Broadway Approvals Ltd v Odhams Press Ltd (No 2): CA 1965
  • Orr v Mitchell: 1893
  • James Richard Jackson v Carbury Herne Limited – O/269/00: PO 4 Aug 2000
  • Winterbottom v Wright: 1842
  • Dr Christopher Oldfield v The Court Of Napier University – O/555/01: PO 11 Dec 2001
  • Bowthorpe Plc v Raychem Limited – O/094/00: PO 14 Mar 2000
  • Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment: CA 1982
  • Bestplate Limited v Sandhurst Autoprint Limited: PO 7 Sep 2000
  • Bryan Morgan v Celcat International Limited – O/025/99: PO 26 Jan 1999
  • Michael McDonald Huggins v The Queen: PC 29 Jan 2004
  • Abbott v Weekly: 1665
  • Regina v Mullins: 1848
  • London Assurance Company v SainsburyWood Immigration: 28 Jun 1783
  • Ministry of Defence v Wiltshire County Council: 3 May 1995
  • Miscellaneous Only (Smell Mark): TMR 30 Dec 1899
  • Shepheard v Broome: 1904
  • British Coal Corporation v British Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd: 1994
  • Mears v Regina: PC 1993
  • Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Ricketts: CA 1993
  • Cheshire County Council v Secretary of State for the Environment: 1988
  • Wyld v Silver: 1963
  • George v Skivington: 1869
  • Charles v Department of Environment Transport and Regions: EAT 7 Oct 2003
  • Elci and Others v Turkey: ECHR 13 Nov 2003
  • DEVICE ONLY MARK – O/298/03: TMR 6 Oct 2003
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A, YA, ZA, Mr and Mrs B T Authority: QBD 4 Nov 2002
  • Pullen v Palmer: 1696
  • Department for Work and Pensions v Thompson: EAT 23 Oct 2003
  • Anon: 1469
  • Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs v Robertson and others: EAT 27 Oct 2003
  • Price v Cromack: 1975
  • Thompson v Smiths Shiprepairers (North Shields) Ltd: QBD 1984

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG. Tel: 0795 457 9992, 01484 380326 or email at david@swarb.co.uk

IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. We do not provide advice. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Only full case reports are accepted in court.

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Colinear by Automattic.