Links: ScotC
Coram: Lord Hamilton And Lord Mccluskey And Lord Weir
Ratio:
This case cites:
- See Also – James Scott Limited v Apollo Engineering Limited and others SCS (Bailii, ScotC, [2000] ScotCS 18)
. .
(This list may be incomplete)
This case is cited by:
- See Also – Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd SCS (Bailii, [2008] ScotCS CSOH_39, [2008] CSOH 39)
Outer House – Court of Session . . - See Also – Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd SCS (Bailii, [2009] ScotCS CSIH_39, [2009] CSIH 39)
Application for judicial review of arbitration . . - See Also – Apollo Engineering Ltd (In Liquidation) v James Scott Ltd SCS (Bailii, [2012] ScotCS CSIH_4, 2012 SC 282, [2012] CSIH 4, 2012 GWD 5-82)
The parties had for several years been involved in litigation and arbitration. Apollo’s funds had run out and a director sought permission to represent the company before the court. He had asked the court to make an order under article 6 of the . . - See Also – Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd SCS (Bailii, [2012] ScotCS CSIH_88)
Application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against order refusing permission for a shareholder and director of a party to represent the company.
Held: Leave was refused. . . - See Also – Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd (Scotland) SC (Bailli Summary, Bailii, [2013] UKSC 37, 2014 SLT 32, 2013 SC (UKSC) 286, 2013 GWD 21-409, UKSC 2013/0038, SC Summary, SC)
After long running litigation between the parties, a shareholder and director of Apollo sought to represent the company in person. He was refused leave by the Court of Session, and now sought to appeal. The Court considered the possibility of an . .
(This list may be incomplete)
Last Update: 07 March 2017
Ref: 190788
