Failure to disclose medical records of damages applicants and military records did not amount to a denial of access to justice nor breach of right of privacy.
Hudoc Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion); No violation of Art. 6-1; Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion) (Art. 6-1); No violation of Art. 8; Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion) (Art. 8); Not necessary to examine Art. 13
Citations:
Times 15-Jun-1998, [1998] ECHR 51, 23414/94, 21825/93
Links:
Statutes:
European Convention on Human Rights 6, 8
Cited by:
See Also – McGinley and Egan v The United Kingdom (Revision) ECHR 28-Jan-2000
. .
Cited – Roche v The United Kingdom ECHR 19-Oct-2005
(Grand Chamber) The claimant had been exposed to harmful chemicals whilst in the Army at Porton Down in 1953. He had wished to claim a service pension on the basis of the ensuing personal injury, but had been frustrated by many years of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights
Updated: 09 April 2022; Ref: scu.83540
