A trial judge’s decisions should not normally be set aside unless they constituted a denial of justice to one or other of the parties.
Citations:
Times 22-Nov-1996, [1996] EWCA Civ 755
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – McDonald’s Corporation v Steel and Another CA 14-Apr-1994
Defence paragraphs alleging justification were to be struck out only in the clearest of cases. One should only plead justification if one has reasonable evidence to support the defence or reasonable grounds for supposing that sufficient evidence . .
See Also – McDonald’s Corporation, McDonald’s Restaurants Limited v Helen Marie Steel, David Morris QBD 19-Jun-1997
(Summary of judgment) . .
Cited by:
See Also – McDonald’s Corporation, McDonald’s Restaurants Limited v Helen Marie Steel, David Morris QBD 19-Jun-1997
(Summary of judgment) . .
Cited – Prince Radu of Hohenzollern v Houston and Another (No 4) QBD 4-Mar-2009
Orders were sought to strike out part of the defendants defence of justification to an allegation of defamation.
Held: Where there remains the possibility of a jury trial, it becomes especially important to identify the issues the jurors are . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Defamation
Updated: 01 November 2022; Ref: scu.140622
