Maw v Jones: 1890

An assessment of damages on a dismissal from employment might take into account the greater difficulty which an apprentice dismissed with a slur on his character might have in obtaining other employment.
(1890) 25 QBD 107
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedMalik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI); Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International HL 12-Jun-1997
Allowance of Stigma Damages
The employees claimed damages, saying that the way in which their employer had behaved during their employment had led to continuing losses, ‘stigma damages’ after the termination.
Held: It is an implied term of any contract of employment that . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 04 August 2021; Ref: scu.182101